Show 1 nW SLIT ri Union Company Co 10 11 tot for totI I Hock lock Hadit Quarried i 1 A damage suit Hult has hns been tiled Shied In III tho the court by IJ tho the Union Lime Slone company against tho the Litno King I Mining company tho the Copper CopperI 1 I hold Gold Mining company Duncan I Me MeI Ie I I mid and Perry Ferry to recover I the thu sum stun of ot for tor tons tanK of or limo rock quarried out of ot plaintiffs 4 without Its lis consent and for 01 damages I to tho the quart quarry by h reason of ot tho ito and unskillful ii to I manner In itt l which tho the stone was taken out ii Silt WIIt i A petition for tor a n writ of at wait filed 1 d In the tue district court today by J Fi I l open In which he asks aek that Judge H It HB B H Tanner of at the thu city court ho he compelled to certify to tho the district court a record of or the tho proceedings had III In his coutt In III Inthe the rase caso at or H n K I F flock Co eo v 8 E I 1 W WH H this petitioner and that the tho order ordel of it time the court In regard to tho the sup SUJ proceedings bb hb h annulled H It HIs ItI Is In lit the time petition that I Judge I Tanner rainier cited petitioner to appear and it testify te as nit to 10 his hi nullity ability to pay ia n it Judg Judgment ment secured him hint by hy I p Co 10 l o Ho He states that he ho offered to 10 prove POVO tb the court routt that tho the Judgment had 11 IJ n fully Cull rull paid hilt but that the court ourt re refused refused fused to permit him to do tie so fiO o Such ac nc action tion lion It Is IA claimed Is lit beyond tin tho Juris Juri Jurisdiction i diction of ot the tho court rout mour itati the supplementary t I tary tar order cruet should therefore ho bo not net aside Stilts on omi Judgments The rime Plan Inh Commercial A Savings bank filed two suits Molts In iii the thc district court to today toU day lal U one against William Davidson and 1111 Peter oter J J Held the other Peter J J 1 Hold 1011 Charles In lit the first aLtton plaintiff m ks Judg for tr or to bo ho duo dUI du on a n judgment jl I tendered d In the Third district court ourt on ott May Iny 10 1 1 1 In III the Iho second aCtion Judgment Is lit I asked for tor nl ni to bo IO title due on oil a 1 Judgment rendered on Juno Junn 0 O l Lii Favor of Plaintiff Judge titie Hall hail tiM has hn rendered Judgment In favo of ot plaintiff In tho thu cut CUIK of nt tho the A Saving company ny against Alexander and OUI Male for tor time the sum Hum of nt and attil Interest amounting In till nil Ic about 8 lI M 0 It II I t wn wa contended con I by lIy defendants d t that tim a t plaintiff phi I ft ann WIB OR attempting to collect nt it the tho rale nib rf mt 20 O per cent nt per pel annum but hili un no cording to the tho figures of ot an nil export ae ne who out th Interest the rate charged Is only n a fraction over 10 per vor 01 cent Th The suit mitt was brought In tn the tho above amount on n a 1101 note nota rot flit Death Joseph L Is I Garrison has Imi sued aued the American Smelling and auth com corn company pany pan for tor for the time death deRth of ot lila his lion eon Edward II II a ho em om employed played to tn handle ore ora curs cur While nt at work It Is alleged tho the boy hy ho was taa caught by a 1 humped dumped of ot tool toni and In Instantly killed The Tha charges the company with gro gt TOIS i i III in allowing time the boy ho to perform work for tor which ho lie was vas UJ unfitted U nfl I ted with wit Ii which It Ithe ho he was wait entirely unfamiliar |