| Show It H I 1 IJ JV J W v houston to Look After of mind and Co Cu Suit was filed In tho the district court I today by 11 I Francis and I both beth Cargeeg Cars g against time the Mackey Printing and II nIl company to re Fe recover cover cOer 2010 alleged to by bu due clue on oum a n promissory note noto executed on aim Nov 7 1903 U Jt la II alleged that lint tho time president of ot defendant company approached 11 plaintiffs for tar a it loan of ot 2000 mInt that defendant Ilef owned an nn valued soloed at about 2000 N H V W 00 her month Upon fuch representations the tho loan was IM made Plaintiffs allege that the tha were Itero told and fraudulent and that tho the property lopert of ot defendant Is U not worth but hut about WOW and amid does doos not earn but hut I OO per lor month It Is IH also alleged legel ii I that hat t the lie t company mum puny Is Indebted antI and that there Is a II chat chattel chattel tel on Its JIll property for tor and amid n II rent bill bItt unpaid II II II of ot II W O It Is 18 also aloo nl o naked that a 1 receiver ha be appointed to take mike charge of ot defendants property ll n the showing by h plaintiffs Hall this hits morning appointed 1 W V receiver r of ot defendant corn com company pany Pail and Ind fixed Ills bond hond at nt 2600 2500 Deserted Her Stilt Sull for tor divorce was waR tIed filed In the tho dis district net court this afternoon by b A U n Mil Miller Miller ler dard I J Miller on tho the grounds ot desertion and ant failure to sup aup supPort port They The were married In this city elt i H HI Au uS 21 1001 aDt and the desertion occurred I Nut Nov Nu II I 1 1302 I O |