Show ANTI IO ATTACKS On the tho general question we wo If It the tho church time tho case caseto to 10 ho lo i 1 n church mutter then he lie In Is I Its 1111 representative and he Is III not nol n of oC the 1 people and It Is only on this hypothesis tho Iho church tins hns Any right to object to discus ion Blon or OP to claim lint that IH Is mon man nut such lIuch Is 19 precisely what enemies S desire to toe have 1111 It II put tor s here hem e In ant e de lie fenno IS On the tho theother other hind hand It If It IB Is not sot n 1 church moiler r thereto thero is III no mUHO In lit the tho world for tr chimp ing lint comment on ids his iu no ewer IH is Monnon These Theo c points ore perfectly clear Wo We clip tho the foregoing h from Hilt Hall Lake c Tribune the tho I only bit hit of oC u n editorial that otters Ilko a Ou In It Is Isa Isa a of oC tho the kind of lit from Crom which must most of or that papers sub nub amt d oro derived IF 11 the tho Church claims tho the Senators case cn o to bo be a n I church mutter matter then thell co so o 1 and eo 80 rind and such nod such may lw ho w concluded Just HO sn nn l lt t did tho the Church say nay 11 or I thinK thing In III relation to tho the CAH CO either Ither pro or con The Tho Church Chulch lens has a no utterance on ou tho tha subject Our contemporary will shift HB tin In ground Bround 1111 In Its usual way and Bay any It In Is tho the la c ere ret N No vs that Timken that claim Hut Rut that bo ho Just n nil nn false also ns as Ito 1111 t about the Iho Church hureh This Thin paper hat ha la never admitted that Senator ease case pro uru proper per Is 19 a n I Church matter On all the tho ron con 1 Wo lave have held the tho position con colt that tit nl his hili Is election and n d lil hili h right to his Heat In tho the Wan ul a n apolitical 1 political matter nutter and 1101 entirely Mo No Moon o ono anft on knows this better than th tile the writer Hiler who employs lilt bis common cut try tr and deceit II In such dots HB As n tho the we are have quoted above It If wo we lint had monde any such nuch Admission as its 0 that Involved In III tho the It If Qt of his argument It would be a nit III he Mates precisely ho and other a of ot Smoot t desire J to It In the he News els the thu Tribune falsely It day us titter r Nor has haa this paper In III that it In Is not a I church matter I tint hat adverse comment upon answer nn Is Pea pin 11 lo and papers papera have hwo undoubted tight light to comment adversely upon that and their is need not he be beIn heI In III any ne nHO it a A num number I her ber of oC sor vory ory good Mormons have hlo ex es expressed e pressed tint flu opinion that lira It wan Willi ton loo lengthy and contained that y ruts was IM no 10 doubt be because cause they dirt did not duly dilly the fact that hint ho lie was vas with a n list of ot 1 put tor void In the protest against L him and therefore liu he found It to reply to them In legal I egi I form although he h disputed their rehe 1111 ancy Laney to Ut his hl ass laKI Hut lint though thol h we WI view I II these theve objections lo Io him llla hi a 1 I an as in ml ails In taken wo 0 have IIII not lIlt AS U nor 1101 have hate we W 1 alluded to them U t IH Is not nl U upon ullon n tor reply nh that M we lava hav zed AH its Marmot rut but on an antho tho the Church Cl nil Hint all HH JIll who have 1 I certain Church hurch lire fire bound lound I ty by Iy and In It hostility to tho Ih of nt the United we wo no As tor ninon Ion Those n fun nm n fal o And Si and have bean beon dragged Kid Into t slew 1111 mid and mixed tip by I the thel l of at Senator In 11 IRS Ills 1 ruse rufo with which they hove have hOI no proper I I III They Thc upon the 0 and tho the maun of Ile numbers 1 ail ivl wo we have tho the right to tD defend the tho ruth runt and expels tho the Slid nud thou the tho of oe tho lira and 1111 the tho piper r tint the Ih c Church hureh In III that lint The of or thin tills nf shunt the tho DowiTt News New circulates In III l I very every settlement nt thereof know that paper papa never r niskos assaults tip up In OI or 01 opposed e l to toH H 8 under any circumstance It linn has hasteen teen Ken always on the tho default Tim rho nt ot nh have Invariably cone from Crom thi ho bombs of the tho Church ho NolIa tae las often remained silent when then hitter bitter f 1 I 9 and untruthful statements Marc have been published hed against It U and tho the cause It defend That has hu been beon Inter Interpreted to mean consent or ur lon lonar of ar the charges node And Ind lId when we reply to the hoods of our unprincipled Culled tOOl fuse tho thin Tribune which voices olee their whines the tho complaint that Me we e art are the party If It we soy nothing It u U k claimed that thal we ve vedar dar dare not hot r If Ir we reply and refute the tho charge charl wo 10 st e are aro accused il of or disturb lag Ing the peace Ile o 0 have base tho the right to show up the villainy and aud shameful course e of or u n I con conS that hut will trill not hot refrain from misrepresenting our faith 1111 our pea peo people pic lile and to told hold up to public contempt Its Ite It miserable shifting and evasions and when It Is in cor cornered cornered curd and exposed We expect to exer rise clue that right fight until that sheet relapses Into Inlo temporary nary decency We have never attacked the tho Tribune W have frequently treated It for months with deserved deserted contempt lint Hut wo we reserve the right to reply to 10 Its Ita mendacious assaults a whenever Vh ner we think tho Iwo occasion requires At tho the Santo same time lilac we wc deplore that necessity It and desire de lre mo most t heartily that It hay not lint be continued There here will bo he penco po rut 0 farns tar far as the News IB is concerned when Its enemies cease celtic to attack with un untruth untruth untruth truth and malice that which we hole hol sacred and which wo we o feel In duty bound hound to uphold and defend If t they the do du not like that they thy can do as tie they the may |