| Show m Till TItI T QUESTION f UI STIO I rJ The decision lit of f In He II IIi th i mandamus caw the Hoard oT of 0 1 f 1 v was Just Juet what I most people Ilc ct i who under k the Ule caso CUI and aIu nl hla ht IKI acu acumen men Tho demurrer will ivna and ml lIKI the tho cn case e The f conten contention tion tiun ot of Attorney lo f i 14 i VarIn V Wit that tho the commissioners had l lIh t 1 t tin th Ih tax tl levy lovy and hud hail pos and l upon ani I It the levy lovy Quill could not I 1 bt law taw pL lI changed OK o by 1 y the City r of ot J l also alco 0 that thet th the u tIDe tax levying power pl r for or educational vM vested In the of County Count COI loner and could ouId not be livid divid divided ed cd With ith tilt the th Hoard of ot Tb i of ot the court question nn of the levy leV this tide heN hue has been much Ai In ot of name oine of or jute thle dispute inflections have ha Mil been ca t upon the tue E Hoard of ot Education I that were not Ju tl 1 fled by b the th tact fact It has been repented Iy Il y charged that thal the Hoard of Education tion mod made a I blunder r In Its iti It at et the tho lr t and had hall to chan e them ater arda and that this was va the of ot the trouble rouble Investigation Inc that I the board estimated c ltd uti p to to the um aum of In order to Coon Conn ty I II CommIssioners In dividing this thin mm anal among the different sources of revenue the of 1 named them go sO gons aone ns nil to show what would s be he needed from fromE E each The Time state tax woe was 1111 expected l to 4 I yield about land lan 1 pale eaJe about JJ S too COO the county tax leaving 1 about to come from tho the city tax cost coet of collection Oll covering the dif difference ference allowed d mulo m ko up the time total c Timie hl estimate has lute not been changed an ne to tho the necessities of the Hoard Board cf oC oCI I nor tho the required from each ea h source of revenue Hut when 11 the County made rondo this tho th 1 l levy for the time county school tax they M concluded with the time County Superintendent I fi ii that tho time county would not notI I need as AI much lu ch money moile for ax Ca i I would ho be raised by b the tho tax rate colts r t fir i for by the tho City Hoard Board of I I 1 I In reducing that rate the time amount for tor forI 1 I tho the board IiI would only roach reach fiOCO In Instead stead of the expected 1 I i The Time rate rale fixed 1 for tor the time city macheal tax lax I 1 p Jive Iho and wills mills wee was taunt found f by the to be enough for forthe Ii p the sum expected 1 from that source en n taking Into consideration the Increase I n properly valuation Hut this hue still ettli i Ii left a n of ot about In til tit ti l amount expected lI from rena the time count m school tax That Is In wh why liy the Hoard of ot 11 ji Education ached for tor the time of at the city school tax l le vy to live Oe and n a hall half It ItJI JI mills so eo na ns to help hell mike make up 1111 the dif dlf J ferenee 1 Ii Tho The great point In view Ie on the time part tort II t of ot o that hoard honI h nl In to time the litigation on this tits I Wit wax to 10 have hae determined the ii rights righta of or the two to hoard In Infixing Int t fixing the tax r rat IH lor Zor duc c purposes In time city elt Member of tin time I Hoard Board of Education may aay they th T did dill nut aut N care rare 10 io much for the on the them m of a mill rate as ea an In antho j tho point h lute heTt re d Although tt th time the court ourt hoe hal m not directly d that lart of ot th the It U appear ap tara to tous toj tomI mI j us uc that further litigation jut Jan now 1 I I would b be and irI i The Thc whole cue caw It Is I d tod on un demur Im and no so tar far aa es that Is I concerned ron there do not hot appear appier a II huat of If a to net lIet et a change by appeal I ell ellAA As Ac to tiny any hindrance In to the he i JI of or taxes no DO what may ma be br hT the hoard of Education C lion tion we think our are art 1 In tn th therm re can cen now no ii be Lia 11 cay Th notices noUre with will uc Joe beAll All nt out ut and end the collection will go IO on L pr may Ina be thought or don dOM mI about it If It there ther II U Imper fe red t in th the law aa a to the Ihl and t I powers of or the two It will viii 11 have to b be rectified rt by b l Ion and rn mn an I 1 while the city win wilt hue hive to 10 man maa manago maam m ago age os with the fund thru that will be avail aall available able under the levy It ul It U U Ia I pretty certain that I Ia the In ru rl u 4 tIn mitten II there will be A shortage Be of or funds tuni s stor r for tor city school H for tor tim cow coin cowIne m mla Ine la school ach ol year The board oart In making li i Its ita estimate cut down lown M Il r oloe as 81 Ible economizing at t ev PT every Ill cry ery corner Orner White will 11 be done can cannot cannot an annot not now no b be decided on Time TIll I from frou th the dl r cooP onoe In time mount amount anticipated from troll a the county which in round figures will be about ICS The Time 1 of J need not have up 1 the total required Into the various eJ Pf mount specified b but blU t tild ao io for tor th the me 1 1 t convenience of ot the County Count r era CS It II Is Ia I a pit that the deficiency oc 00 occurs I r r curs but It U cannot now no be helped hel W WP Vi may mar be bo pardoned W te t hope hop for tor making a suggestion to the tha I of the board vho ho we weI I It believe Nile are doing good 1 I work and nat net natural ural feel touched when wh n J U he I saM aid toot that seems eeme to reflect their t nate acta It li Ii that It U would be bitter bUer to cultivate the county I than thon get Into lato a too body bod It Ia I no doubt Ju Jolt Juit t at AI I W J i iI I 7 I to I do what Is le bet beat for or tile the community In lu 11 other of mid too wit ira beHave that harmony of IC vIos lovli and unity of authon could b be orr ct t between the boards board It If they would get set together and anti mutually matters for tor tho thu general welfare This rhu litigation liu hue hus not been boen fairly cr yr reported The Tho Hoard loard ol e f did not ot miscalculate or cr change lie Its estimates as to tin time l for Cor or tho thu coining year joRr Aud AuLl Auditor AudItor was not lIot made u a 1 lef n 3 nut 1 but Jut woe was simply H a 1 M In th the thill OHM there were ware ue other oIlier Inaccuracies IOa of ofa n a 1 minor character nod and th the cU l board 1 WAS ve put Iut lit in an un unfavorable light not miot warranted by time the or O r the facts of the th CUM aesa ell ellWo Wo We think tilts this explanation hi he due dIM to time the partita parthea and we that the News eve shull b right In Itt lii and ami also correct t In tie It com elusions We Wo hope the lIMNS of ot Edu Education cation will wilt find mean to arry on tin te with the moan maiM at Its Ite disposal Attain Again It will have to out cut the garment to UN the cloth |
