Show WANTS THi TI Mrs Ir SI Sho N is I entitled to In It I lly Imy I of tf an tin Agreement Mrs Ella Ela J Colle has hag lied a stilt milt miltIn ul In ln the district court against Mary Mar J Laux and Angus Angul McKellar for tor a n house anti and lot nt ott east Fifth South or judg judgment judgment ment for tor the sum of money plaintiff al 01 alleges alleges leges leIM to have hae already paid pRill on the prop property property erty ert The Time complaint states that Mc Me McKellar Ic Keller Kellar made tad a contract to sell Fell the prop property property erty ert to plaintiff representing that It be belonged belonged longed to Mary J 1 I Laux and that If it I plaintiff would pay ruo and assume n a mortgage tor on the time place for tor 1100 30 Mrs Mf Laux would give her n a 1 clear title tte to the property Mrs Mr declares that sloe she Iha paid on the pi place nee ant then learned that Mrs Mr Laux did not notown noton notown own on the tho property lint but that It I belonged to parties unknown to the plaintiff The latter lutler Inter further states slates there ther Is II no mort mart mortgage gage no on the prop to but that the time 1300 1305 I represented to be a mortgage Is I the turn eum that Mr Mrs Laux In is II Indebted for to the thereal thereal real Teal owners of the property properly and that she Rhe does docs not net Im and an 1 therefore Imi hM no right to filc a deed dr 1 to it It Mrs Mr Colle declares declareR that she Is III ready to pay py the balance of ot the tho money due on 01 the prop properly property property erty erly and n alk asks the court to force farce the pasties parties sued to either give he her a deed de to the same or else elRo refund the money mOM she has paid with Interest and on PY the tin costs of ot the suit lul |