Show i AN dt DECISION 1 The Th decision 11 cl of ot Judge Jud e Lewis In the cages Is IB reported In n an oilier oth r l IJ van rt ot t this Issue of oC the thO New le till tIu j lo for r tho thu th writ on tho the ground that tha thu tl I r Id cd dt tit the Ule city of IBM uly illY sed by bythe bythe byI I the Oily iy ns Ml yn n In III the vote ote i overriding the veto ti at hc This nets III a tt rest re Urn the important question which has ha been touched t ched upon In these theRe columns mid which occasioned Homo Home dubiety and In tn thu th public mind mimI For It if ns liB n claimed by b 1 council counti couII I 1 for the tiit petitioners tHe r of ot 1802 1112 was no not legally linseed by IJ the council no end etu of ot trouble might ailse from the aside of proceedings that have ulo been boan under their authority Judge I c linn hUH given ft II clear cl ni cOneie and opinion on n that Important ques quee question qU tion and has hai shown a R mind thotIs In l gratifying o 0 hl his ide supporter for Cor the tho position n he occupies The decision derision Is II of to 10 the olty and we lire are Kind to 10 toree see ree this mutter s e promptly settled HO o far In n the public Interest It Is III however that the thu ne I will wilt he ho op II aIM to the tho supreme court n we ve Inti und there In le that the subject will wilt be thoroughly treated by that tribunal |