| Show NYE WYE THINKS HE WAS LIBELLED Therefore He Wants Coltrell and Punished P WARRANTS ARREST f k f I r lr Attorney Tint That j lie Waw I 1 d and d Don I 1 Hy nr rembert It t T S thai the city council Is IN n ne neI nerr v vrr I rr without Its aen Dy far the 1001 sensational mutter concerning lt members the to light nt nl li dllY whan City Attorney Nye NyI tiled lII d ft a complaint In Ju lr will oui charging President lre ld lIl tI Cottrell Jr lr ana nucI Councilman Ft Fj S 5 with lIh criminal libel Ibl Th nl lego that the tl two tWI c a I report to council pUMI contain the thi malicious and il Ilal that thal th city attorneys jury Juri was being L Investigated by the he grand grand the filing of or the complaint lamed warrants for tor til l or of c ami anI placed them In 11 the Iho hand of Sheriff for tOr The by Mr Nye NY are ae the outgrowth l f A J D vl Introduced nt fl the lie social BOal weeks ago providing for tor the nt of ot two expert ex accountants to audit lh he bolg ut It ti th city und of who handle bandit IY ot the city cly fund Tho resolution tion ton submitted to the finance rom com for consideration and a I week aR last unfavorable ago Monday night an In report upon the pame wai Wil submitted to tl tho council signed by Cottrell Cotrel and Robinson who constitute a B majority of or finance committee A AJ AJ J Davis Dal who In a member of ct that com c r refused to sign tho report Rd the chairman ot or the Ihl commit I teo toW wait not present to eo his signature wan 1 not attached u THE m MATTER The The last paragraph of ft the report Which contains Ih objectionable mat matter lal ter Is M lt follows IJ As thor ther II ts no charge of fr tny wrong doing dolUK or Irregularities In an at Dt the tho department with one or two X and us 18 one of ot these the tery department is being by lh It committee for that department and ant the other the attorneys depart department ment m lt Is under tinder investigation by the grand jury and Inasmuch ns us the au nu auditor had hat been be n keeping more mora or orIe Ie of brA a heck check upon tho de do departments tn In the past pat and tho auditor lulor 11 mn the tho that he will 11 audit alt ol dt account not nl nl ready t d lm as 8 taut an n time lime will 1 per permit r ril mit il we 0 ree no need ot of Incurring such fuch an for tor no n purpose nu OHAD JURY The to tu the jury Jur In Ine e tl t l created considerable dl din In 11 thu th round onil ond several embel In that the Brand crall Jury had not investigated the city attorneys olce Fern and Cottrell slated d hut hat the ji JIp ller Iere their au nu for tor tho They Th y Informed th t an nn of ot Mr 3 n 1 lind been called caled before the but that was wa all al It I Wf II 1 nully nail IW the Ih council to 10 eliminate nate the following from the th report and it I wn ihen With one IC or anil ta M oiin oln of these the tho cemetery department Is I 1111 by the committee that department end nd the other the department In Is under lon by the grand JUt Jury JUtH It H I stated that before the Ile council counci meeting last Monday night City CI At Attorney torney e held hell a I consultation with th Cottrell Gotrel fernstrom and and ane that a I be b mode made in the of the th statement that his ot f fe e hud been bU 1 by the tle Jury jur It II lc II that Ih Cottrell Cotrel and an left the room rOm to 10 retraction rl urh r ell to sIgn noy reasonable drawn Ira wn up lp by hr Mr Ny to tote tob te b to the council counci 10 BO an 11 to III h I US luch publicity au ny the report the tho He le signed sIgnet the nl written by br the attorney and took It II to an of or whom to 11 It They The wanted It I re referred rl tr n to give gle Mr Ir Nye No tin In c to 10 appear apPelt and state hU iy of t complaint plaint refusal to 10 slen the retraction f In the criminal libel action be I II them by Mr Nye Ne The for criminal libel la Is a fine of ot 0 or six Ih months in inthe Inthe the Jail Ja |
