| Show a MUST DO IT Sheriff have Hare No RIGht Bight to Work Pria Pris for Cor Individual Benefit f t tIn In answer to a communication from County Attorn Attorney II n N No lIU of lUsh field Reid Attorney A ener l Breeden yester yesterday day Ila forwarded an mi opinion to S Sevier Ir r county to the tM effect treet that the Ike jh sheriff herm of ot ofa a n country has bas no right to require 1 onera confined In tn the Ute county jail nd undergoing at e to on l wk work upon D his for tor his hl own on benefit fU In this tills the rays I s 1 I apprehend that thai If there r F FI I wee wan no public work ork to 0 ho lip done such sulo no ns comprehended under un er tho the statute tho the sheriff might permit hermit such Huoh prisoners to 10 work on his hili promises It If they no so o for or recreation and exorcise without he heIng heIlIg lug Ing subject to any 00 criticism On moral grounds It II In is tar far better for tar forthe the prisoner himself to bu be engaged In seine noine honest work than to lie He In thin tho lIal daei coil coll of ot tome some county cOunt Irlon tiny day after aft r day In reply to another question lou Gen en nays A justice of the pence peace It is not entitled to 1 the per pur diem dicta dt minted In III I section of 01 time the revised lt for arraigning n a with witha a 0 crime A a justice to t bo be entitled to this fee lee should hear testimony or ar as argument gumont on the trial of o a 1 cn case e anti in inthe Inthe Inthe the simple arraigning of n a prisoner neither testimony to nor argument IN is hoard hence h hn his cannot avail noll himself of this statute |
