Show PROVO II 1 Mu Irl M tI i of Ia ol Divorce l 1 P i h Co o April r P i I t f med flied suit for 11 dl Ir I r I t 1 Charles barbs M I Patten latten yet eS 11 rI iI u the grounds of or cruel and ln In u i consIsting of calling 11 and abusive name Plain i ti h tit hot restored il to her maiden Mm sU Defend M 11 Pa 0 u s of ot and amid ap pp r nce and 1 the time Iq granted grant as asked n for tor dc de M iW h r lIt y costs cost COItt r Tt p t I nm i 1 were verc married at P yon i J Iv i 1 dw of Goshen Holler t ii lI t inn company v ss 1 Mt Ml N Nebo bo bol a l I IrrigatIon company et It nl III It i i 1 that thaI dt Mr I i j i 1 I anti Irrigation company Compan u 2 to answer r amended tJ i r Theodore M I on onI I for Cor of l I 1 state set let for tor heating hearing May fn I State of at Utah vs VI Pter Winward et at al 1 r d o 0 l days V to an I OIT NOTES A hut hUH been n born to Mr ant MJ Mrs Irs AV W II 11 Itay Hay a nil all wen well wena Frank l irby a n WM was ecu sen to 10 days for vagrancy by JU ice John yesterday BaIley Wall wn down dOlln from front eAt rib Major 11 n W Vf Young wa as In n Provo yes titles UtI 1 to for the Utah Sugar SUar company 1 Time ho of ot n 13 F p SmIth of oC Thistle was an burglarized e early un this week p pre ore by tramps who carried off art a n suit Bull of ot clothing und and some chlap jewel jowel I ry |