Show suir POll IOU INSUn NOI NOIA Anna A 11 lm Wins on 01 Appeal to 10 thin the Court CourtIn In the case cas of oC Anna Ann of oC the estate tate of at Charles Meyer re r deceased appellant vs 8 the Standard Life Accident Insurance company supreme court has haB handed down downan an ni opinion reversing tho the judgment of oC the lower court lurl and ordering the de tie demurrer I to the th complaint overruled nail and tim the action tUon proceeded with wih Thi Tiu suit was Wal brought In the Third district court id U recover cOer 50 00 on an al Insurance policy louIr lucid held In defendant det company Meyer was killed hilled kle In Wyo Wyn on Oi June Juno 20 9 on oil October Or 1 I who IH ii I n a cousin cou ln of ot deceased etl learned learle of oC hIs hU death On l Vb Feb lC It Ks 1901 I OI she obtained rosi of ot his hll personal effects erects And discovered that ho he 10 utah had n a policy In de do defendant d company A week later she pave gave notice to de tie defendant e of oC Meyers eps death anti and demand demanded ed eui the payment of oC the policy which wan 11 refused rusel notice or o death hind Imd ld not been Leen given defendant Imme Irnine Immediately I miI upon the death of Meyer eyer and litOf of at death had hall not nt bees i furnished with lh In itt two lute months thereof us as al required lu iii II the lie policy olcy to make It effective SuIt Hull was 0 filed red anti and judgment asked for tor O Defendant demurred to the lie complain complaint ami Judge Jull sustained tho he ordered the complaint dismissed Justice Ju delivered the opinion of ot the court which holds that mit defendants that plaintiff Old not comply with wih the provisions PrevisIons lonA of the policy poll In regard recard rear to notice and an oot of oC death Is not good ns as nI the facts Ir lr Ir the complaint which are lre not denied liy by defendant shots how ho that th plaintiff Old did dil dilt use t due diligence and Ild furnished the notice and ond proof within a 1 reasonable time after she learned leared of oC the tho existence of ct the policy Th the complaint therefore old ld state tarts tad to constitute a 1 cause of Ot action arton and the demurrer should have Ve been n overruled The Tit oilin Ion Is I concurred rO In by Chief Justice Ju and Justice Hartch Default Decree Judge Hall Hal has rendered a 1 default leCault decree of at foreclosure of ot mortgage In II favor of at plaintiff in the thc tle ease case Cl e of ot Mary Ma J 3 Hurton vs s Frank A Irani irant et al ai The amount of ot the th judgment Is IA 35 35 prin principal prIncipal cipal Interest 1200 10 attorneys fees tees anti and 12 co cols costs ts The property fore tore foreclosed foreclosed closed Is ha part of or the south louth half of ot lot hot lit II 11 block 42 4 Z 10 tO A J acres plat nail part anc par of lot 3 S block blok 30 JO plat phat pin A |