| Show OPINIONS II ISS no The supreme ne court of or I had hie tl fRt compulsory vaccina vaccination I tion l II constitutional The rh court the view that although that alteration tUny IM he In some caves yet the public lly hold that It la Is benell bonell Therefore the concern of ot the Indi Individual vidual mint inUit give way to 10 that of oe tho community at large In tHe tHeA A different view VIII 1 III taken of sub aub subject In Holland not nollon long ngo n 1 bill wim Willi submitted to the recommended by the government K for tor forthe the th modification of or till the vaccination laws KB ha I hlen is en done In I The of ot the United States legation at The Hague ban Interested himself In Inthe the mattar and found that the reasons n 1 for the tho bill are 1 I That tho opinions of experts with regard to vaccination In the Nether Netherlands lands hinds do 10 not agree U That there are Homo whoso whose par lIar do 10 not reel feel In their children to thu operation 3 That for such Buch parents tho opportunity of giving their children the tho neo 1110 oMory educational Instruction Is de III debarred barred ba Anti And thus It Is found advisable lo In one country nf ter another to give an nn option as to whether they that kind of at medical al treatment or not I |
