| Show Till TI I ii ii I The Ih Introduction m an ordinance In hI i ithe tho the City C MM nIne nn to repeal the run r H t tr the th rhU chief f or hand h nd of ot well ouch d i ut to If verify tin Hin Hinder tinder der to tilt Iii i a M li or r In Is Involving I ollig hip h pa Ia yn yI iv n f ni n y In his hla bror br r I llly in v l tan can an up II t w I a 1 i l ln R Re r ti t ti IL r in s st nn t 1 t down ll k t MI fl n 0 t taw awL aw L The Till abt b I nf of t i the for rr i i i llon llonA A therefore i 1 v l i I M mJ i but Jut an n of oC onre nn e on In the port part of ot th tb I II tra Ii that in inI I d 1 in ir It 1 tn tt t that Obal h ti 1 II in fl lor lort ore OTt OTtI tut I t t M m in the tho t r n R t II IId tI I tt et unc a nn n Ute the 1 t u I 1 for lr Wt WI jae the lIt II Un r li I ono nillo that IhM of liB Its it date dale nf nt its tl DUC I n Ii n I by IY h Hi tb h M r WI Vc V Kl h 0 to it lit some sont Interesting I as which would adoPtion for IU Its n show hoft till thy of oC some coins certain Jut but bu In a t somewhat tha nl mice ruH rR tip H old w would uW be lie ac H well l ft In III the shade tt TI should bi be that the City ClI Auditor wiio wito bo comes In for COl lilt Itle Cull full uteri of ot with th the majority of ot the City Council Ii m required to corti certify fy 3 that Ills his warrants warrant have ha been u n issued be of ot They Thoy would riot not a cording I to law la hut character It IC according to tilt the so CO highly by hr I our morning He II III IC to act under tile his oath and nd be supported 11 not nol blamed for tor his Ills law lawful Cut ful actions That thu should Have their pet pay ar nobody disputes for Cor a it moment Tin The council has hes pointed 1 out how this hl can an be done that U is by y the Captain cf ot otI if Police I Uc the payroll payrolls M i ltd hed of ot the LII department pending pentin the 0 decision eels I on tue of oC of ot it the M U to O the validity chiefs ehler Now ow If thin II Is not done donI who It Is to blume If It thenon the themen themen men non are ats I kept out of ot their pay ICY Ia for un rille AVe Wo are arp plen d to tee see that A n test tell case cArte camIs caseI cArteI Is I I to 10 bo bI math mad of ot tile the lie disputed lion Ion of or th 1111 ti Chief by lIy a vot VOl vote of or R It minority of or If the th council but H ii majority of ot tx a l of that body hody That It is the tho root la II the of ot f the trouble QUI warranto provided by hy law lal for Cor the tl deter deLer determination of oC the mutter Mandamus might ht compel the payment of oC the pollee payroll and nd It might not lot but It U would little the question of ot riot at n ce the lIle Ire The rite Attorney Olne of or tint State Stale Is II 1 the Ihl proper officer roler com corn complaint to commence the notion fiction when chin a plaint li II 1 made It may inky InA IrO go o before IJ Core the this t court or HIP Supreme court c dict di dl direct ct An in n appeal may be taken by either arty to tr the latter hatter Ve We We hope hop Inga ix will be lied had without |
