Show I AGAINST J CL Il 1 o Grocery Kile FI ion fur or Writ t of Ir Prohibition I A it petition for a 1 writ of prohibition was WIS flied filed fed In the district court today toay Ly ty 1 the liv r cp Grocery and Meat Mant It com coin Inn against t Frank Vrank I H It I Clark Clarl Justice ot of the Iao for tor the lie First l t precinct to restrain strain defendant from inking any nn further action In the caw cate of ot Laurits Nielsen v VI vs the J rope Grocery ana aM Meat which wa Wil was filed le In wild saId all court en Jan 3 1503 1905 the Tha lh ac no action C hon tion ton wits WAR WAi brought to recover ICO t 00 an as 11 damages amae for personal Injuries by Nielsen 1111 arid Ind for damages to certain pel property by reason of ot a ft col cal ll Ithon lon with one i of or the wag one ii as Petitioner alleges that on inn ln 10 ic Mid said defendant api eHr d In court Court IU its 11 y and demurred to tl the Jurisdiction of at Justice Clark Carl to hear c the caw caso ClO and ant demanded that lat the and men files fles therein b be to the city cl court Justice lark Clark to transmit the r f the city and on o Mardi March Marh 30 over overruled ruled demurrer and gave javo It I live lays lR S In which to answer alfIr It I Is la ni gd that tnt unless Justice Clark lf is II r be he will wi render Judgment against the tint meat company the peti t Ii hr rev r herein h and U tt It II i naked asked lint a 1 It of or prohibition 1 I be Issued Il to Jre ir r ont any ly such suh action acton The writ wn was Wil leaned by y Judge Stewart this morning and Is III returnable on Saturday morn mornIng lug Ing IIA April 18 IS at 10 nt at It which hour hur Justice Clark Cark Ig is cited to shot shop e CUI uw why hy he lie should not be e retrained restraIned from frum any an further action acton In the tho case CAl |