| Show SO No U HOUM POt IOU If It one were wore to go 10 from place 1 to place to for tol a house hattie to rent on one would woul 1 b be astonished d at al tIme the number r of land landlords landlords lords who even een In this thu city absolutely close clo the gates crates unmet children Title This Is II i Q condItion In la all larger clUe cities nd yet fet there liter ls It I preaching smut ami moralizIng the time tendency toward families All nr are a aware that the bible ore nrc very pr much needed In time the economy of ot the tho nation And mitI 1111 yet t land landlords landlords lords would rould deny denT parents parenti a sheltering C root because e they are I rents ren t tA A I Chicago ahleman recently took a decided In the defense denae of oC the lie I He II Introduced an ordinance to I II I prevent unjust discrimination of at In this till matter The Th ordinance hid had the following remarkable where whereas as aM Where hen wt It has hu ha become and anil Is I the of or owners owner agents and man mana gere of or apartment houses flat flab and amid ten tenements to 10 discriminate against and refuse refus tu tn to If or nr rent rf ht to 10 paniCs partie I or tam ram families rammel mel ills In tn which there theme ire children or In Infants Infanta tints fanta and ancl mu mill what would be the nat net natural nAtural ural lint and probable Increase Int to the population lation latto of Chicago contrary to the tha In to I junction Upon our our first par per parenti ruts elite upon u their expulsion from tho th Our Oar den of ot Eden to 10 multiply and end replenish the curth and anti aall the policy polley and of ot put our lr national administration lion tion Th Till ordinance wee was of course courle sent to t a to be bi done dosi away eway aw with Th objections against a It K e It clear clr at al although though the tb er clr nl appeal t a great t number umber of It question has 1118 two rues rides and Ad hj hi Is II I not an en to that ru rut e eOne One ODi why wb J object t to I children Is III because they generally ralty are ar I emitted to destroy property beyond the th unavoidable wear wr and tear Par Per Parents lIt might I enOI to remedy routed this ty bJ exercising the tile necessary control over their children But flat very t often they dp d 9 not do 0 this thiL They do not take lake tat rare of f ut 14 property as a s they would Ib lr c n n They The ar mire and aid OF tile art are left heft to to toI it I I fancy km h by Iv Un le Lt mill Itt ii I lift l I t mini III IIIi i nt it 11 lion J i t 1 1 m ith h i hit hll hitt It t I t A 1 1 I I Ji 1 lit t I It t tt till th tilli t i v i I P v making i tle to tou toI t 1 u II I r extent than Ihan s the case now no i 4 nis Mf ru S and anI might go 10 to toil toI I il I lid nd pUlp Ulc th iii II i In ar Ir IrI I II Ii with I Ith I hi h iv nf t f bolh |
