Show HIST AT T IT 11 ITA A which according to te Iti It own on la II not an orn of any abr party part hag hie undertaken to cut oft off from the party four Ken lIn who Ibo art are counted by their party as much than their abusive execution executioner er e The reasoning c br 7 which that paper reachel the conclusion that those gentlemen are traitors to 10 their party Is II that a members of ot the t Coun Council cil II they th did not see eye to eye y with the Mayor on certain proposition Its Itla a poor rule that will not work two ways way On the lame line of ot logic would not the Mayor be classed aa al a traitor to bla hi party because lie III dill dis disagreed agreed t tour four members of it who are city and In fact tried to ob obstruct and aDd render nugatory the action f t th the majority of the members of his hi party part In tIN the City Council on several I not our proposition IllIon but the brilliant production of ot th the pa paper paper per that Is II not an all organ ollan In an ae that the IWI undertook to settle UIe the party part of or the gentle PAU gentlemen men referred to our contemporary sim simply ply pi a the equivalent ft which la fa composed ro of ot three letter paper which I II nut aa II organ to making ln Itself the laughing laughingstock stock of ot the party for which It as a ato Mine to and bUDt sense to quit when It has b run to the end of ot lit Its tope rope of ot assumption ab absurdity 1411 r oj |