| Show THU THI lOIcl I 4 T U JC I our n have h 1 1 o J Venezuela in order onIer to t Amerl an on tho th Monroe doctrine nod find i f a n further definition of ot that thet doe doc oc J I zinc line they thy nay may accept Ca Ma Matan tan s statement In lift tM National Review c It t the ground completely Hn U n eye ye 11 It Is ala nin to arg argue argie ie I concerning what the Hits Monroe In IA from coin a r yr t i p atlon made of or O OIt I It to any otT i ncy Nor I cnn can on thi re be b y nt if to somo eoin announcement formally It 1 Is III to b be hoped lopell will flit n s r ix 14 but which If It It V rU would doubtless remain liable to contrary Interpretation harln the fete fate from which l r en of ot l nor a bull of ot the pop can con claim exemption That IH III to ray cay the WO Monroe MI doctrine toadies the tho Ui th j r t y to 0 take lAke care oara of Us Its It for tor I t tb my II d h time what do d duel and anI a doen not net constitute tute tote an ot of that doctrine The Tb as al the views Ie It IB Is the plus plu Interpretation n ai cc oll may Mill There cannot b be l a I of any more mol then than there thre ran can be bf a bound I The rh doctrine gradually has III shape hapl Mr Adams Adam In 1823 declared d I that list the tile Wilted United and Mexico pos poI exclusive to navigation In their lr vicinity and Rod that a 1 necessary consequence of ot this thin was Willi that thu I the tM American continents will no longer be subject t to colonisation Jefferson taught laught AB An a American principle never ner to suffer to In III with rIA affairs And AnI Monroe In his hili message of or 1623 Vi WI owe OWl It there thore therefore fore Core to 10 candor find to 10 the Ihl amicable re reo l between t een the United anti and those thine powers to declare that we VI should houll consider coulder any attempt on their part purt to their system to any portion of this as nil danger dangerous one ous to our ur peace antI ami safety MIl In III those thero there are several distinct principles enunciated ni aS n parts JArt of the doctrine J is barred from establishing here hero or at Int In the he affairs of lit American e or oven even from extending the J systems tome of or o over r part of or orthis I this hemisphere According to this I the Monroe would prevent Great Britain fur for Instance from mm do de II Canada of ot III Its present form for III of ot government and of or n autonomy autonom Again l it Is II both bothIn In Britain and Franco hu huS b been tn figuring figurine on on an building the tin Panama canal thinking that lint It could do lIo HII so b because cuu u Colombia would not alienate all nate any of ot her poll Foil to 10 Germany n even If It the IhO ca canal canal nal aol was waR built by 11 I capital Hut this thu reasoning would rOuld soon Ion be found to tobo tobe bo bl too toe shallow The Monroe doctrine would quickly be seen seon to apply to that case cn e were exe the till proposition over made Fortunately that question will not be to bete tested te ted for tor or the canal will be lIe e construct constructed f ell ed d by b UMI torn I |
