| Show 1 VS S CIt for Writ nl 01 1111 anil The petition foi ri n f nut i of or mandamus In 11 the can nf of J ci 41 I re recorder fe corder li clerk of the th illy ty VM Il Frank H 1 lark justice of the th peace of or the Kim precinct was argued In part Judge Stewart this th morning l n t city CI Attorney A I orney Shoup argued In behalf Ir of plaintiff Iha Ir ain all Attorney J A Trick represented de defendant d The latter attorney was WI tin u able Ihl to complete his hiM before court ourt adjourned tn 80 the III further hear hearing Ial ing of or the case CallI at U mm 1111 next Saturday At Hint hIli I time lime Assistant City Attorney y 11 also make mik the final argument In behalf of plain plaintiff tiff tt The petition p asks akl thAt a u writ of oC man mandamus damus b be Issued defendant to compel him to turn rA o r the records of hi hil tour ourt to 10 the el recorder who Is 1 by sect lOll Inn 23 HI of If the th Session laws lawlor of li l charge of nil I the records of or the It courts court A of of ot the nev city Il u tt raised r II by b In his hl argument He H claimed that the act at creating the rulL Is III in conflict onnet with and contrary to na nation e eton tion ton 33 3 f r i f the Ihl Constitution of t the state and hi hn n v Is l unconstitutional and Ind void ohl He Jl also alf claim I lm that defendant Is IR his hi on own aAI and the th successor of all 11 thi th Her Justices of or orth the th peace of or the It in a 1 u Jl 1 I en entitled n courts titled to the books und ld records of ot suld At AI adjourning time the Ihl court OUI con continued the further hiring of ut the rase a aun until un II next net Saturday morning at t 10 lU |