| Show 4 DC UJ Wo IVo are uro pleased IMMell to 10 learn that hint Judge Diehl Diehi so reported In III of ot the tho papers did dill not express opinions Justifying the thi kind of oC boycott which lute mis hern Instituted I net by b some labor agi agitators tutors certain restaurants te lie He did tOIl himself In lii sympathy with the labor element and maintained the therl rl ht of or all ehl citizens to the tie peaceable bl use UI ot of the tho public streets without obstruction rul tion One ant of ot the tho cn cs brought before him him dismissed ml on motion of oC the tho prosecution tot for lock lack of ot evi evidence dence denee and In tie the other cn tn cne u o a II dispute arose nrose the tho th attorneys for the Anti and defense In which re cc remarks marks were lr ero niale which vero attributed ed Il to tn tho thie Vo Wo that the Judge did MIl not nol and dues does not coon coun countenance tie tiO obstruction of lit the 1101 nor with people who vho desire to patronize places of or o business Ii Some Borne of these come corno under untie I the lie ban of or the union formed for forthe the tho protection of ot cooks cook waiter tatters tattersall r all 1111 1 that Ill has hn evidently olI exceed legal rights People may torn form a U society for lor tho 00 of ot any an lawful purpose SIl but bUI they cannot annot bo I tier per permitted to Interfere Int with tIm tho business of ot those who do un not lot coincide with lIh theIr IA nor will they the bellowed bo be allowed to pre vre prevent re vent or OC persons p r oll l who wish I h to 10 enter en lor those Places of ot business from rein do doing lag ing MI If freely We ore are glad to know that those sentiments are lle nut not disputed by bytho bytho bythe tho the Judge Juile Jul who tho Uns called upon n to III toelt Ii alt elt on oIl the IIII oases II |
