Show iii Why HP ha 10 to nf 01 1113 Wife 1 very veil evidence was In the Uis i cult of vu vs W v r F In its which a mutton fur fuu ry alimony nod and attorneys nu a ui i being lit I Judge hell Jin hud heid that her hur hud Hi vi 11 her hui Ito money dor eter hug tI although he hit was wasI I 55 v per ittS from thu th thin in i Pi I u 1 l M ny anil itCh Judge Mall hi hl ii ruil iii order Patter un II lu to it li hIs wit SItO W jr month tern ternI jim I I I i I I e f t tInui Inui i nho 1 Ii Imil t ti 1 ii I r gil hit i lu Lii I ih it proceeding th 11 n tun of the court II rt r nit I 1 t 1 I iii kr ti i SIck tilI nt I I t tIt huh MIH grant rant j I He hl he Imd up lull I 1 Iii vIt to the trie of hIs hi Ii I I I i nil up tIp hit his statement number nf of for far i i ln ing h It hill i i uh InUI und which had beU 11 I I em that thi ii I I i I ii r I ii lv ly lui sli Ii WIll IH very f t alK UK ilir iu Il foi fril thing beyond his nn ii it On th ihu vi tho i hind on I nii hit Wit S or ori i Iii ii il um un she ht had fall fallI i mi un bin in i k fust tu tie him lio hO hOi either Btty It Ul up v i t II i tn to Id I t that he hue wan V I K It I I cit to I 1 p tl th iii n btu Wall Lest LestI tl I ll I malts ui t It would be paid Id out 1151 fur hes It IC Veil to I tm he fliM 51 I 1 it r I ii rh at tail lb teen Mi hit il ri to pay py payi t I f ile luring ng that i m i II tin I U t bt his nil all the 31 r ir it tl 1 I nn Till iv Fl I hl 1111 si 1 i n ii lit i hi hr hi hiu l 10 i i an as to IA ton n like him ilo tb that v luli h he I Is h a thIng to Iii Ii in UM how the order tM t fl lo in I the he it loom Cutler Petter boys If the theu son ii i d MX 1111 two ton u Ii 4 t to KU o i It It him ami aith they I ht d dill Id Im with w lIlt him itIn fo ml b took r |