Show diy Trial of Ezekiel g odam ago ngo suit against Salt Ifs Is s still ngon on before roe 4 t u n Jury resl d his bin case before bufore noon MOlt today and the di d 11 dIto frono Ito p ll to Introduce duco to t Ui The IM vase Will not lIot gy K to Jl Jury ry till Friday r lIln i 1 Dc Alleged 1 rl 0 O Erwin Is lIln 1 U 1 for lor It ft divorce alleging desertion tim II d I lIon u Tho Iho li marriage was WaR WaRIn In I thle lIy on May 27 21 18 1105 G GI GI I t NOlUS 3 3 budge U IrO Hull madu tho following or tIers dens today 1 P V Holman v VII vs Salt Ball Lako CIty and Power l wel given plaintiff to lie 1110 complaint to Howcroft vu B 11 Union Irrigation company motion for nsw fl trial over fI I tiled plaintiff excepts ll Jor to re tax lax coats costs overruled David It ivans VH vs John neck Dc et ct al Judgment for tor plaintiff l Love vs VI J 1 II u Lovet Tou yO t overruled l Defendant gIven II ton days to answer t 5 tJohn t John ll lJ ck VB Vs Utah Commercial lt nna Savings Savini bunk demurrer Plaintiff given ten tell d y ti Id lQ answer Wilcox V W Vs J 7 C O mo 0 n from froan calendar on ott motion or of plaintiff 0 11 Jl White s a lit L 1 If 11 on ott motion of or counsel for plaintiff M 21 Dus DUR eldorf Is a n hilt demurrer Is III pAP l In n a roM o t of ot calendar t John vs 13 1 V Duncan et Ct al ni demurrer and gl v oh vie loin len daVs 11 to 10 answer r rL L Ann M 1 Chadd VH Vs George Moser ot ct al n motion for how trial Defend Defendant not IlI nut nat excepted Tho TIn case of o James vs VII rhona rhon ot el al nl was by hy II H HI J I ftp for to plaintiff and nd Thurman and Wedgwood W tot fo dc tie anil taken under advisement Tho Tue notion WAR wag 11 brought to recover Ie oel M t 1 tiM iM with 8 per POC cent from tr ni Fob 19 10 1 IM l nr which h bi Iii I claimed to o Do Ito due on onn ona a n note noto Mory M filed Itt miU tu today for di dl divorce vorce from Martin West on tho th ground of ot Time The was IlK nt at l n IlLon Feb f 4 u |