Show A JUDICIAL Thu disposition of or the thO case caso detected In hi tho thu tho It who ho was wt liquor without ft fl li It license offense of selling cense cane appears to nn c an us extremely Illogical nn and absurd The therl rl I lIcO Mn t the Iho d w 11 complete Tho TIlO court declared ln t It t f haWel the rt to tt have been Violation of the Iho law luw I w In Iii In Intent n nL I guilty of or IL II l L Yet ho was found tent und and purpose e not 1101 guilty and an The Tho reason by tho the police ii I of the tho acquittal In spite fi justice for tills this method tho the I proofs ot or guilt WM SL that thai not flOt In lo ac accordance employed by the tho poll IOU wore WOO With It ith the tho lillY law Vet ho he admitted that the police h Md d acted noted In Rood gOO faith then nd he hc did dl not ot to detective methods were vert wc DUI But It t employed similar to those that lino been uteJ both Joth In Europe tho Unit United tho the only means by which cd ed State an U could bo ho fastened upon tho f t the ilia olt in violator of the tho law A policeman plain clothes bought tho t to ro 0 ns s to tD toi that It was WIS Intoxicating drink I and of that method of at Ing leg the tho defendant woo vaa found toun i not nol guilty of or doing that of which tha UI th o opo he was waa guilty positive po O proof showed l which was WIS so no recognized and stated by 11 the court Now It may mar bo ho true truo that dt dl 1 d of courts court have hlo been rendered 1 Ihn el t if 01 such nuch teteo HIV v q five Uvo methods In cases caC ca ea cf ot unlawful lIquor lIquorI I selling thero there lire are many precedents Ju 3 1 a II conviction upon tho the evi evl adduced If U tho the policeman vi latell the tho law In buying tho the which wo SrO do pot not admit for fot a n moment 1 the common sense gena view vl w of the matter mal tel would be bo that ho bo ha prosecuted either cither ns n a v principal or a i crimins flut whatever would bo Jo troi cr er lr hj this case ense It seems s com very ory ery clear that t 4 th the he accused who wa wai 11 pronounced guilty Rully of at o n i violation of ot the law In Intent and i purpose ought to have been convicted nd fined taking king tho the very expressions used by b the court The Tho decisions ot of atI juries often otten open tu to popular crit criticism I hut mt In tn thin onto case tho the decision of ot tho the court may be ho fairly pronounced In to Inconsistent I 1 consistent when viewed either from a aular popular ular or a n legal standpoint |