| Show TWO JH 9 Florence tt r 1 and P J Fowler Granted Today Judge Hall hail this morning granted a decree of oC divorce In III favor lavor of plaintiff In the Iho case of oC Florence K E Selby Belby VB vs a James Jamett E Q Selby Seiby The grounds on which the tue decree was us rendered were faIlure to support The Tho defendant was In default having left letl the time state sonic Homo time ago ngO and gone gono to Mexico where lie ito wits WitH last Inal heard from tram Mrs Ir Selby Salby was given the ousted custody of oC their minor child and was wan restored to bur imer maiden name minnie that of 01 Florence K I Fields I Judson P Fowler was ivan grunted granted grail a n decree of 01 divorce by Judge Hall Hail today train from his lila wife Susie Fowler Fowier on the Iho grounds of ot desertion Mrs Fowler Fowier did not appear and her default was en eyed lerell Sharp Claimed E K J Wilkinson trustee In bank bonk bankruptcy of ot the time Star Grocery company IF is suing tho tIme company for Cur which amount was wan paid pahl by bythe b bythe the Star Grocery company and credited to Its account upon alleged threats of oC defendant to attach Its III stock Klock of mer nier merchandise merchandise chandise and after utter It was known by bt b de do defendant d fondant company compan that hint time tho former fonner corn com was Insolvent It Is alleged that the time payments were secured no Omo that lint do de would get more than Its 18 per lIer percentage of at the tho tie of ot the Iho Insolvent company and an thereby prejudice time the rights of ot the time other creditors which Is II Isa IIa Isa a violation of ot tho time bankruptcy law Probate Court Frank J 3 Tucker has hos applied to 10 the district court for letters of oC adminis administration on the time estate of 01 Stephen W V Tucker deceased The petition poll lion stated state a that the time personal property of ot the es cc estate estate tate is valued at nt and the real tell I property at lit 2000 The real property It is de as liS time the west of at lot 6 block 6 C plat lOut I II D There mire are six heirs to 10 the estate named In the peti petition tion lion Tho The matter was set ret It for Cor hearing Friday Feb Fob 21 Petitions were Weme filed In the district court by Ann Sanders praying that she be appointed R administrator ot of the estate of ot ThomM Ward and Sarah SarahWard SarahWard SarahWard Ward deceased The estates which are practically the same lAme consist t of oC an un undivided UndIvided divided Interest In cash on deposit depo lt In the he Deseret Sav Say lags bank blink and real estate uInta of the value of SOD described In the petition as liS part of ot lot i 7 block 63 6 plat C There are art five Ie heirs heir being the same lame In each r estate The rho Th petitions will be heart heard Fob Feb oll 21 tit 11 it 10 to Court Case Tho Time court down own a 0 da tie debit yesterday o ler afternoon In the tue ease caso OIl O of or Frank Frnnk Thompson respondent VH vs 11 8 S Shays Hays appellant limo tho Judgment of ot time the lower court which found In Iii favor of 01 plaintiff The lime case heC waa WUI brought to quiet title to 10 the lImit water right rl hl In III mid timid Suit Ban Banford tort ford Irrigation ditch In III Dig BIll anti and It was lIa decided by the lower court that hint time tho was wan In III plaintiff The rime de tie defendant Hays appealed to tu time the court on oil time tha of oC com committed on Oil oi the tha trial of Or time the cause time the decision of ot the court which Is 18 concurred In hI by Justices add oM The de decision decision states that hill I tAe to record In the lie Ih case COBO Is fatally defective Inn as us It I falls fails to 10 sot set forth any Ru motion mollon for a 1 now new trial unit does not stilts state any on Which such lIuch unction motion would bo ho made mad Consequently Gon the lie grounds tom for n a new trial not nol being In the thin record the court cannot surmise what time the grounds wern ern anti has hay no moans of at knowing whether any errors occurred on time the trial whether er or the findings supported tho tue proof HaiKo Hanco In tithe this case cose tho Iho lie only thing before borore beforetime time the court IB Is time the judgment toll voll and a ano nil as no Rio errors appear upon Its lis fate faco lo the tue judg judgment jUdgment ment meat of ot time the loel court Is III COUNT NI H The Tho Utah National bank la is plaintiff In two suits suite In time the district court One Dime IB Is against F 10 K 1 1 Houghton J J JThomas Thomas und tint N A to recover O anti and Interest and 10 fees feus claimed to 10 be b thus due 11 on a Lu promissory note flute rIme other in iu J It l olI 11 anti and Nellie N U n Foulks on a n note given to tile the payment of ot alio timo note In the tho first case The amount sued auell for tOI In Ih time till thelast last ease cave ca e Is i tutU and Interest and olId 50 at nl attorneys feet fees Anna Annn C e S lies has commenced CO III III suit null tot for divorce In time the district dl court against her husband W V r T Schied On n the grounds of or desertion do ellIon and amI failure to 10 sup Sill support port imort |
