| Show A QUESTION A correspondent In Northern Utah de do an on answer to the tho following A a n tract ot of land for tor which ho he obtained n a 1 patent from the government he ho then thou s ld to H n u a poe por portion tion of this laud for tor which he gave him himi It II i warranty deed cleed Subsequent to thIs thin lu hn w sold lo tO C tho the entire tract for tor which he ie gave vo n mt 1 warranty deed doell mind also A Agave gave the patent to 0 e C 0 had hl his hili deed recorded anti and him IttiS for tam twelve or years roam paid on the Iho entire tract II also ilso hud hod his dued d recorded subsequent h I y to lo Cs C Krom m this you 01 will noto note at nt th l time C C mode hl lila there was nothing on record In the 1110 county court to show Unit A had sold any por Imor portion portion tion lion of ot thiN laud land MIr many years yearn c sold hIs hili land to ton 1 n which Included the entire tract tenet D P bad the matter flintIer Investigated and found that t I ii 11 had a portion of ot tile Ills land anti and titus discovered that A had Mil sold saId to two putties the time same eama of It land and hail had given each eRch a warranty deed deell flitch Each had ho recorded ns as you III note nolI Jilt but Ds was IB RU to Ci s 1 Kindly note noto also 1110 the tho fact art that luring during the tue c 1 owned lime tho land hUld h paid taxes on tho tue entire tract When I D cattle Into possession of ot tho the land ho also paid ald taxes on tho time entire tract Thus at al atno alM atno no M time Iliac did H II pay tuxes taxes on ott any portion if this land IlInd Who of or those thellO parties would ho be e entitled to the tho lahd what position doe doa do it Il place AT A D lifts bAa 11 evidently a n clear to tho the land In III question quo Un tin Under ibm der till tho laws lawi of Utah tho recording of ot ofa a n deed Is III an nn essential part hiatt of Cf the tho eon con conveyance C 0 having duly recorded the deed dead from A cutna caine Into legal Iota posses possession 1 lII sion slon of ot the entire tract tI ct that ho M pur purchased chased II H lost his claim through his hue own neglect ho lie might be b considered the tho ot of the tho piece of ot land which h he ho honestly purchased but bul legally ho Ito 10 Is la not D IY appears to be beIn beIn beIn In lawful possession of oC tho limo entire tract Second A occupies the tho petition of ot ono who tho engaged In a trans notion The rhe statute of limitations lute has probably outlawed the tho offense olT HO so that he would bo ho able to 10 escape In tho the courts court the consequences of ot the time wrong but t morally ho Ito Is II anti and It if a n number of the Church he could be brought to account and It circum m stances B wore were exactly as ns described ho could rould bo ho required to 10 make reparation rO to tD IV 13 If it the tatter latter BO so demanded A wrongful act Is never noor outlawed In injustice justice or In Church fellowship |
