Deseret Evening News | 1902-01-03 | Page 3 | Loeb's Eternal Life Theory

I Medical Authorities Iaco V cry r In iii It II New York nn nil 3 Prof Starling pro professor professor fessor of at physiology Jh nt at the till University College Collete of ot Nerve Specialists Sp according to u IL d dispatch to the tho ho Journal J and Amen Amerl tan can being asked con concerning corning the lie ills die discovery covery of oC Prof Prot Loch Loeb said Bald Prof Prot Lo Loch b Is n a man whoso whose opinion Is worthy worth of oC respect for tor or he has line ao no great work In physiology As An to this particular theory I J think lit litlie litlIe littie lie tie of at It Iti It was wall a jump julio In the lie lark dark QUO ono of ot Innumerable theories on to same subject up liP partly of at a u number o of oC views already known to tho lie world Tho The living cell coli or Is a n brick wall which thich physiologists hare havo been un unable unable able to seo see through Yet Yot we wo can cnn tell tel what hat goes gocs on the he cell but bitt no nomore nomore more Prof Prot Loebs theory Is an nn nt itt tempt to see sec through tho the wall One Olle about this living hiving thing Is II that It not only goes goe down Jut hut up 1 It breaks down then lien recovers an and Ind theories like Ilko Lochs Loebs explain half balC the tho process 8 the breaking but rail fail railto to explain tho the recovery Tho Thu rea real problem Is 19 tho the power of ot building up after atter breaking down downIf If rr Lochs theory bo ho partly true 1 It only explains part tho the less Important part of or the tha secret of ot living cells This Title marks an nn advance but hut not an nn epoch Dr DI Daw Dawson son Williams editor e of ot the tho British Medical Journal said Prof Irot Loebs Loebe explanation of his hili theory con can consisted consisted In tn a 1 lot of at assertions without a I shadow hadow of ot proof Prof Prot William of ot University College said ho lie did lid not believe In the lie Loch Loeb theory but qualified the lie remark by b saying he Was unable to speak with authority In the tho absence of ot scientific details