| Show THE PUg I ImY ESTATE I How the tho Interested PArties View tile the H It ItA ItA ItA A Mows reporter called on Mr r Jos Joseph cpi eph T one of ot the th attorneys attorneys for W V Mont Ferry Perr and Edward EdwardS I S Ferry Forr as ns n guardians of l P Pl Terry l ch In the Important Imp suit stIlt brought by ly them against David D 1 and others other anti and who win lo o represents lIla them In Ih i the legal mutters million connected with sold satti estate 4 Vh hen n asked what he lie had to give the theNes News Nes In regard to the articles pub In the morning morn In papers ers with re ro reference ference ferenee to the affairs of at the tho Ferry es eil late Mr HI said Mid I think there Is a great deal of newspaper no notor tor regarding affairs which are of ofa ofa a n purely purel private nature and which can cannot cannot not be of any an possible lo concern to th public particularly after an earnest effort on the part Sart of at those Iho o directly In Interested to avoid this disagreeable tIlH fea tea feature ture tOre connected with the transaction of ot th theIr lr business With reference r to 10 the thene newspaper ne matter batter purporting to detail that which appears of record In the th Third district court and us to 10 Its It cor correctness or fallibility fa II I have nothing whatever to say III The record Itself certainly discloses the court preceding and all nil the th de details d 1 tang tan d therewith with ull clent cleat tulln to satisfy even ell the th most curious public For VOt any all deductions deduction which may lOa have hav been lIten u n drawn from tho or statements of ot Itra cotIs matter wo we o are aro In tn no manner re ru reo and anti hive hat no knowledge of or ortho tho the source from Crom which they nil alt derive It If there ther are aru re any difference lv l between two n the gentlemen whom I 1 retirement nt and either Mr Ir Irwin or Mr Ir Klc nIc tIce or I may ms mM say Sn any nn other pt pitRon It ti to me that th t It IH Iii eminently proper anti It h l I lour our nur purpose M to try those tho difference npR In the courts court and ariI not through nowr papers apera If tt th the they y are Af not net of amicable adjustment and an I 1 r lace ve every er to believe Jelle ve that m In my clients on Ill Ii the Mine Ume view lew In regard to the matter |
