Deseret Evening News | 1901-05-01 | Page 6 | That Divorce Decision

I THAT TUT Ul Philadelphia Press The Time federal supreme court curt holds for tor fora torR a R matrimonial domicile Once ere cre Rte ted this can cn not be changed chan 1 by re ri removing moving the th residence of oC one 01 partner Doth must untie unite unie In a change of matri matrimonial matl menial domicile liven Even where whar as no l In one ono case cau before beor the tho supreme court In this tub derision d a wife ICe married In NOW New York and litter later resided in lit Kentucky 1 forced by Ly her husbands hl miscon misconduct milon duet duct to return l turn to her old homo home the court cout holds that the tue court In Kentucky retains jurisdiction jurl can CUl divorce o hire here h rl hief Jus Justice lee tice tre Fuller Justice Ju while hlo admitting time the general Insist that the time husbands hu misconduct enabled limo wife 10 rightly to resume her Iter domicile In her fathers house Time Tho ho el lol of or tho limo federal supreme court 01 Oil n these eases cases coining us no It does aft r a of ot de ile le In lii II our nU stat sta courts until may lOlY bo be e taken to a lab l h as ni settled law that a n husband or wife wHo can Cn purposes of ot divorce change his or her domicile alone New Now Herald Tho lie federal supreme court does docs not the dissolve deny ceny right of ot one ommo state to the marriage tie tl on omm easter easier terms t conditions than another There Is IR no 10 doubt however that tho the law ns 05 ni thus limo 11 laid lal down makes valid western e lesti lef oay f and amid mot more uncertain than It II Ithma has hitherto been popularly assumed to 10 be 10 The obvious tunA time the only ef of effective remedy for fOl this deplorable con condition dlton of ot affairs Is 18 as I the time Herald hurls has his often pointed out rt n I uniform system of marriage divorce In place of or the time state laws intro 11 many of or then them loose and conflicting that hut now nol prevail I American has hat long lon been Importuned to 10 act In iii 11 the th premises and the time agitation tion tOI to Induce time the tl several states In lii the tho absence of ot federal legislation to enact uniform divorce laws Is Ii Incessant All Al such efforts have been futile and ant the time number of persons who are divorced In one une state and amid In iii the time eyes 1 eo of or the tho law InI of ot another util married Is l con constantly Increasing lg hOMO ThoKo decisions by tIme the supreme court are nr therefore op opportune