| Show Toil O WHIT Rendered III In Favor I of or John henry W V New Ness York April 10 says 1 What Is believed b to be one of ot the tho first I ICO cases cafes CO PeR decided by a n Jury In III favor of ot tl I payment of or a gambling debt disputed on the ground of or Its illegality has hilA been heen disposed of fir In the city court COUlt before Judge The rill Th Jury n a verdict In favor faor of ot John Icy lev on two 1 I O 0 ta ts gIven Riven to him him by hy Henry W u n known broker of or this city one ono for tor 1300 and the othOr for tor 00 Mr Ir while In St It Via on March 3 1819 1859 tall a n tn to n a hou o k kot Dt by lo lest t nt at He II nave gave dV hits hla hi hiT IT I T 0 O U but ns as ho lie el to pay Bradley placed cl the th matter mol Iter In the hands of or his counsel coun eol A If II Hummel Hummell Mr Hummell put POt Jut the th I 1 0 U Uc 1111 In evidence together with ft n let Jotter tor written n by Alexander Lament counsel roun 1 for tor Ivl hl t son soil Oll saying that 1118 client chint nt wan aA de of ot the matter without the trouble of goiter oln to court If Ir a ft short ex extension exten tension tenton ten lon should be him on the tho t nd admitted tanking tho the notes nole hilt but Incited In that they wore wr Ire len 10 o pay for tor his hl tosses losses t at Mr asked on tion It If ho he would not have taken I J d leys money moue had ho he been a 11 winner and he confessed that he would It took the Jury but a n few tew minutes to lIn l a verdict against |