| Show I TRACES Of MERCURY ii la lait IN RICES STOMACH it h Prof Testifies to Finding Them Not Enough to Cause to be Given Next NexE Monday New Now York April 11 Lawyer Albert AlbertT AlbertI T I 1 Patrick who la Is charged with has Ing caused the death of ot Win Will m Marsh or filee the Texas millionaire will limb probably I rob ably know kno this thin at in ll whether Jus Justice Ice tice Jerome will hold huld him him to tu await tin action of ot the time grand Jury It Is generally Iun expected the tea tes testimony limon In time the commitment in will all nil be In this thin afternoon oll The first tilt witness today was WIH Win Wnm J Kinsley on handwriting The witness was sas all handed paid by b Swenson Company and amid signed by Mice and auth iia then thell handed till the lie 1900 will and this the th cheeks checks dl for tor or drawn on 01 Swen Swan Swanson son Hon Company III in favOr fl r of Patrick Mr OIl Kinsley lInsley said that In lii hue his opinion tha this on un tho lie will and auth tho the chocks checks were not mit written by the lie who signed the thc lie checks presented by the th pro 1111 prosecution nail having tint the U genuine signa signature ture of William M Rice nice sst Dist Atty Ally Osborne then lien hand handed ed oil the lie witness liness thai tho assignment on tha he I i Fifth Avenue Trust company com pan and what Is III known as nil the cremation er letter antI Mr Mm Kinsley 1 said I have already cum com compared pared the on Oil thue I papers with the admitted n d signature of the tue lalo Into Mr Ir Hire amid I say uny that hut In lii my amy III opinion I they tho were It not written by tho the fume person Ierson Defendants counsel Mr MI Moore then asked the lie witness If Ie lie hf had any personal knowledge of ut the handwriting of ut Mr HIe other othol than that hint certain signatures were vero shown him him as ns beIng In III Mr handwriting and ami lie thu ox ex expert pert replied that lint he had not David N another hand writing IX rt corroborated COtTo 1 t statement Ita Aunt Dint DIt Atty 0 osborne Oburn bi rn then ft i that the flit prosecution it Its uI e Ui til III it Prof Prot the n gusH Prof wa was nut mit wa rt coui coult cour t and aM a i rac lelu recess m wwi wu 1 ordered JI hi hil hIs arrival r Plot Prof un umi t In lalI li testified that thai tbt P h had hR made an atm examination of ut tho the lol r nil ur urK nt nn of ot William Wilam M Id l Hk tu U i h h ht of 01 n pt In Iii II the thu q ht he fount Q a II ft groin grain of In ia the he kl kid 3 li ey of ut B a grain Iraln ot of M the Hd III an un quantity 9 8 There was wan nm nul aUm cury rury M t ue death deaHl U hOt but b t th hy I pr pre W of It ht m n Din Iw ti nutria In that Ih ha ft a lurK hUll t b n 1 by W the tha 4 essed e ld but lut ut Ju Jt t how how mui h he lie could bo determine Wile said sid tu he II had liml hl Wn se n nt Ir bruin brain and lungs lung but w WIS ws a unable to toof of t their Ion Jit llou Ion an as Il h he I tie not Dt t I W With lh these w ur wt urI ul t I II give five Jve an U e rt opinion On 01 r t hn Its ri ot r flat of mercury would several mouths month th tb had be bean n Introduced Into I bo be tt i could not hOt lot say nay IY how lOng the thi fi fl would ull remain ln son roii 01 to i whom thorn w om the drug wan I cued Hied tf d b L t Inhalation Prof Prot V ePt t the com I O miH Jel aler a l r argument arlum l i Ilaw law jaw aweis s NH vi II l W bp b hII At t t in i low hse of the tM I r c saul alt he Pie h would with whet n RK ne n to 10 wh a MI strong lied liml teen licen th hi itt holn t r Patrick O i of ot until limit ii y i isias sias a ii td until ii at II the thu th I i iThe Irl The Flue rl dd waived i i ithe the forer M W n i t L I Short und I 1 i ties 1 held hll Ii f II i i iHal Hal I Hull is I I for Shun fwd ii ad Mr M x CHI Ill h The 11 nl bull bath 11 on Oi the forgery chai rha i |
