Show COUNTISS SS m WISH WINS In iii II v vs O J J 1 o omi ii U ie I I II vr tl Now York ax llAto division dC at Jt tho the supreme t court uit banded down a II decision It today tOlla thu tho In 11 thu the ruse nuo rl o of nt Anton j 1 Dt DIt against t J ct et DI ol al trustees under the will wi of ot Jay dould ouM rime case s before b fol the tho court CIUl t nf of lt up 1 penis from nn an order from Indict Ju leach I ton tI nu an grant rd tt d by b Justice Fitzgerald which limited time the lle amount to bt Je paid to the an tie te lo to a 1 year pending time the trial if the thu notion indor I limo do IC doi i I of OC tt he time appellate division the tIme trims ue LeOs may mn Ima pay the time hir l r full fuli tul In tn inS Ini i S me 1 Charles A Gardiner utti for tor tho time thoi i iiii 11 trim s tees said Raid sal d of ot i ih Ii II d clon The fa caSe Lasu e Involves 1018 nearly n arly 20 00 trance and U ts in tommy r a n test tent easu caso On tIme the 11 points of law now nowa decided a in I fl our OU r favor tavor additional au nearly franes de to depend depend pend John 1011 A Dillon Dion chief coun coon counsel ash sel of the trustees es sold suld TIme The he majority of ot the thc court held that the HIP 11 party substantially Interested here hee Is the time Countess Cn that the tl tim com complaint plaint showed on Its 11 it fac fhe ho he was VHS IS without the time of at the lime tl State Slate of ot otNel New Nes Nel York Vork rind 1101 Ind within tIme the th of the timo republic of Trance France amid ami that they the could not mint obtain service upon her within with II the State Hilt of ot New Yok that In inthe the tho absence of ot of ot process upon limo tho Countess In lii tIme the th State Slate of ot Now Nov York the courts of Now New York had and amid would have no Jurisdiction to tn de determine d termine either cither whether she alms owed owell the tho debt or what shat was uns a proper allowance for her In tact fact could deter doter determine determine mine maine nothing which affected liar her sub substantial rights In any case cle In hI which sue she teas cees has not boon been served with n ci pro NO |