| Show DUTY RUSSIAN SUGAR SUA One be a Countervailing It ps Placed d 0 On GAGE CO Ir I 1 A SontO erY to II V Tork T Feb to the tho Jour Jur Juril Washington tWo lIa there AV 1111 a 11 whether tal il of problem of Ji tJ to 0 tM be Iu upon duty ute on the 1 from Q of o that the thO Is 15 In fl p whiCh will b e kt to a bounty Letor SecretarY W Y One relates to lon I a to their tM woJ were M Dedal ent of ot O tO tho b r a sum went to 10 vho but Lut t Is If ne e ten forth tO In the thA repOrt tullY fuLlY let Mr t ho ques lues fre U II shall bo be fl ot the lIn r jj noW asked bY bYr Jeen bas ha J Griggs Itie ap for hIs bt opInion PitY to r that there Is I no flO dr to lIt to tM AAI bY br the th tax 0 grower but a Is restricted to toren J BAd and production lor or ellch ren amount must be mar IC 01 O f production but the th gro Kross a production t abroad contributes told od Jd a abroad MW that of the of ot 10 adjustment ol the following year the production ot oC at producers who it 11 U II tA In the Interest their to o ditre u to ot of exportation tb produced II a sur am t tiO oe who have concerned to phi but are less 1 tIlt tUtt quota ot O the ThUi ThOI the II a larger arger at secure able to are while the ex CX exI Nr the future premium from the I ter rm mellos a over and ot 01 the from tIto tho thor lion ioe the price lie be ar arIt r advocates ot of t a the It II t J by duty dulY that tho entire Is under the control of tho the exporter does docs and that bounty through gOV a U h Ills It ta contended Involved hut Is no n bounty t tut lt there sort ot of Is arrangement a the between SUo su who ho are taxed gr no nol In anY event elent Ad l aId from their government lIt yiew Ien Is correct Is 1 a of 01 these problem tU ne secretary of ot the treasury Inuit decide |
