Show o ON Tin QUI ab W IV rue Tho following letter lottor dated 7 T Thas linn has been received from Com our friend C A Auy Aay uy ay I Mathen of Gunnison who hio Is U wull irI t t J known as II a n practical farmer Carmer Irrigator c and man of oC 1111 I rs Note Koto 1 It seems that our good h lit natUred patriotic and able abla u lo Legislature tul b Is actually oll upon by a u pro pHI profusion fusion of or on un hol ho III It u CI lit now laws and am more inor salaried 1 In III Increasing th till creasing the tho burden of or taxation upon s ii 1 the people Note Nole 2 H H II No IG 6 IS la l on un a par with nt ni and of or tho the game leaven an ail H Ii 1 II B No 01 51 I ed crl It H remains a II positive fact to practical an 1111 Initiators that such Is not hut I called for Cor because It Is I not hot needed need Id And Anti AntiI Andt t I 1 our otur farmers through many years ex cx experience exI 2 have hae adopted rules And regu tIni I lations to suIt null tI all iJ Our Irrigation companies as liS well a 1111 Individual parties mo are perfectly in II tho laws to arrange and Is ii control c all ull matters mailer tn to Irrl 1111 Irk In without being with till 1111 1 by lJ superfluous legislation Note Nole 3 We e believe bellew tho the should Id let he t well alI enough anil a nit not listen to uny more on un Im irit er or of irrigation lu luls s en Note Noto 4 t Wo We should not hot want to bur tair burden Ii den tho the State with privileges to a dispose dl JIse of ot nor should the tho State look to III IIII I the product t of the clouds for Cor prospective U tive tiva revenue ad Noto E Ii If It misguided political eron econ economists a clamor for eminent domain prerogatives or more moro dominion over Ir Irrigation matters wo o 0 shall look lonk for a aa has legislative verdict of oC hands ort oft ho II sl a i Note 6 0 R S f H Ii 1 No 10 ID 6 anti also eisa tit th eminent domain concern should Ix 1 is consigned to the tha legislative waste has bas basket ket u II ii Note Noto 7 What Whal we should have II I what wo we o would like the Legislature Ie l to 10 I get enacted for us u In III established courts I of ot f arbitration In all nil our main water phell something like hike luit hiat Mr Mv II Gins Gln a mann proposed ns os a n substitute for tile the nit Holmgren H U H n No 51 DI 1 Ii Our correspondent has hns perhaps over ocr overlooked overlooked looked the announcement In the Pw Des cret News New that the hilt bill Inserting I 1111 dt wat r and anti Rt r rights In the law lawon lip on eminent domain ln huts has gone where ht lie I desires dOl that on an other to bo be consigned WI Vt V commend his SIlK SUR SURto Ul to the Legislature The pro provat proal al water vat r measures had hall better betl r be tie an laid over oer As unfinished cJ business or nt orbe tb be sent lent to follow tho eminent domain fl project el If f the prevent laws law on water rights rl Mr c Art arc carefully examIned l they will be bey y e found fund to me meet t con On condition conla la In Utah and alto also that even cn It If itt t the th arbitration boards our correspondent I ti lent dent de should tit he at the matters matter be baton bIjO them Own would have hav finally a to go S1 to the Ih courts court IC Aa As 1 to th r of water lI It j li Is I provided l f for r In Title M 21 of or th Ih the He Its J rn Fit vId 1111 of But Hut all th record art ars not With this the th county r rt re 1 When Wh n an adjudication lh or of f water witter suits ha hu has b been n had anti and the Ih re respective r rights of litigant and ane claim claimant r 4 ant ants have be been n defined the record Is IsI I of or courts courte In the of or the clerk of the court Ourt and not with th the county re reo reIl Il tho the matter altogether the see most practical elj 1 it UA J with whit ti water affairs of the 1111 StOLe Stale are ar opposed to tn th ch nf proposed be lie beCHUM CHUM fret thy they art a ar sec second 8 54 C and ond they th will whit terribly complicate mat matters matters and they the thue will b Lii of Ut new nt anti the laws of or other othir States are oro to our system stem and aro not In our cur State Slat Con C n Drop the needless lion tion Later Wo that tin the th bill on out the tho question ton above that b Is H II II No 51 61 has Ims been hlen killed In th lions No tears tearl nt tt the futural |