| Show GARNISHMENT BILL Piloted Many nIlY Amendment The much Hewlett wage ex bill finally navigated through the HOURI yesterday after being belne but buffeted feted fetell about by b more than a n dozen amendments Th se nil all applied to sec section tion 7 of t the bill and related principal principally ly Iy to how much of ot a mans manH wages should be exempt ex and whether or no noho noho ho must bo married to be entitled to exemption The new law If IC it will exempt of Qt the earnings of ot the judg judgment Judgment ment his personal MI vices rendered at nt any time thirty days 1118 next preceding the thc levy lev of ot the ex execution execution or levy Icv of attachment or 01 gar garnishment garnishment when It appears by tho debtors that ho he Is a n married man or head hend of ot family such earnings nIt are necessary for the use UHe of his residing In this State 11 sup 11 wholly or In port part by his provided that when the earnings art 2 r day rr less such married man or of oC a n family shall bo be entitled to nn ex exemption emption of 0 a 0 month and provided fUlth I that In no cafe cao shall the Judg Judgment ment mort be taxed with the casts of ot any An proceeding to obtain by b levy Ie of ot pi II otherwise any part of ot the b of such auch judgment debtor for Cor paw services er rendered within thir thirty ty Oln next preceding tho levy lev or vi such execution was the m In r who voted against n the bill Harmons bill Xo 0 65 63 also went t the lower house yesterday was wall transmitted tf d for tor tho Senate S U tJ or The rile bill U Is for Cor tin th purpose tf Ir provision for tor the monthly im lit of f the contingent expenses M If the tho Uti superintendent of ot public In lIou At present they aro allowed along with the salary |
