Show GRAHAM CRAHAM CASE IN SUPREME COURT The Tho Supreme court continued Its Is ses set session sion slon Ilon today and listened to arguments ar II itt n three criminal cases crises which were up for lor or consideration The Tho case casu of ot the time State vs s Fred J Mc fc appellant who vImo was ns convicted of or arson by ly the time district court and sen son sentenced termed to fourteen months In the tire State Slate prison llrson was ius first taken up The points raised In the time appeal of ot this crate cuse uro Iro the lime he mime sante as ns thoa thore In the case cus that hat tine the 11 Information signed by the tIre attorney C Instead of ot the county coun at nt attorney orney torney Is void voll The Time case cast was argued and submitted on briefs s and taken un under under Under der advisement by the court The he next case vat wai the time State appel appellant lant ant vs a Jesse Reynolds Time The he defend delen defendant defendant ant was found PolitY guilty rull of 01 fornication In Sanpete county aunt In May Ia 1900 1000 whereupon lilt his attorney W V K Reid Held moved mOed th tine i court ourt to set st aside the time Judgment upon UI on various arlous technical grounds The motion moten vas granted by the time lower court anti and time the he State appealed tine the case to the Su court which dismissed d It and the tIme action of 01 the lower court court The Time next case cl e called up was the VI vs s John Jehu C Graham appellant The Time de do It I will wl be he remembered W as S tried In the Third district court and convicted of unlawful cohabitation on nn June une 11 1 1900 and fined U O or Im Imprisonment In the hl Salt Lake La county count jail all one day for lor or each ach dollar of o the tire line lne Tile The he points raised In the appeal are that the time alleged offense otna was wal committed If it I committed at nt all 11 In two counties ami nHI the time defendant raises the time question that thu trial court had no Jurisdiction Ex Fx is also nilo to the tire Instructions given glen by the trial tal Judge to the Jury jur The rhe he case was argued amid Ild submitted lion Hon Arthur Brown and King Burton R e Kins il on behalf behal of ot the time de do d it while hIIe tIme the State Slate WM represented I seated by hy Assistant OI W It R White |