| Show r i I 2 of Marriage and Divorce 5 la Is one of oC tho bout bOlt lr r 1 divorce In the Die United HilS a He lie probably Y appeals In mOIo am In Kew lew York orl and the thlE r u h a 1 E t I ani Other lher J nt n t of oC the IU me court mind Slat thc tho nt lib libI t th I it t between the law lawt 1 and divorce In i I the Union While tho Judge II i t In thu tho did i nixie th n with the tt 1 Mie Ml rep by judge F court of 01 Nov New York ot th tl line III Ie again t 1 I Iii Ih j I a II very ery u i h t to o much cannot bo lie Bald ns as may u II re t I i WIl im an BO 10 over ovel the without ill u to IJ the conclusion that thelo 18 Is Iong at present li h it I that one woman L u I mans legal lesat wife In uc muther r is bound to him In holy I III II I m u m in Sioux that he Iw should I bigamist hell heie an nn of uC the tho thoi Mit there n 11 i i 1 the serious complications lilt t an iU bound to lu affecting not in 1 light Jut but what la Is Ull UllI I lu the legitimacy le lt of off f li lire are now J j by Dy li h cafe e carried lo 10 thu tho supreme court I i States H ih Ihs s point I limn Il to South t co and n decree which I In that mate him tilt the theof I F of another mm I HIli lint first wife hall hag not nol placed 11 r the of ur the thet Ih t bus Intel po ed 1 no defense li is retained her hor rights In III her own I i und elt li remain his hili wife She t turn mound around and sue him for a dl wife 10 No 2 a n r jt that she ho does not heo ce lit Vu u The fhe hu may 1 a Il aIn h In he the West live there nomo t rn a n family He lie may then j Jd lo to 10 rot in n Hunt I R t to the It 1 11 i h ft rI and lio ho Is wife und be he may have hae more children rh It IH III legitimate nt II III I In the tho other tute rn tl the a II little further urther and ilo do you ou Ret el A man may be a Il IlI I inKt t with n dozen wives hes and M i OH a many r nt statin gach Is III bound to 10 him I Ih Hi laws of or tho state where the ri it was contracted antI he may 1111 r t 8 have acted within the letter of or It t ft IV In ant In 1 h i in I lip U It cornea comes down don 1 I 1 of or J would lip hI more dangerous dan Ih r I to 10 assume n that b caune n i i tiC a n divorced person might be DI lo le lei loi i r New Jersey It bo be con coni i 1 In III the Union In r o places such sueh n marriage would be he mII II i perr has no for dl hI ho hI can surely pome nil I t he may have will bo be sufficient for tor torf f fire arl laws to 10 suit all the onh illy lit In I to find them and to 10 In Int t where they th Ion n a residence The fh mu R avoid ono one state South where no 10 are arc grant I for tor any till fur n a first It Is some Im p s to A mm 1110 v with n girl rl Who ho Is III Isi IIII i f H 16 In New ron con trac K a JI marrIA l with her where n V i Y York rk he ho would bo hI of or fl ii liable to a term of Im ImIn In rn Ww New I 1 tho h woud to I ho he thin tI n 14 to tl fall tAli Within tho f r In sm tut thero secret sc rl marriages between minors both bildo bl hIe und groom are subjected to h ment in III tho Is 15 directed to the party celebrating the tho mm ridge In still other to tho person 1 the tho license while In some states state titles attach to all concerned conc and In a few Cew the property lights of oC the tho thoI 1 or husband are or Involved I There has lIal boen considerable I In the Ihl Northwest within a few m about a proposed IIII to prohibit mur I of or persons suffering from tuber I other ailments to I to their progeny There are bats to e recognized In Indifferent I different states all having certain pro 1110 on account of or blood or kin kinship kinship ship Con marriages Are gen gem abhorred 11 m Although his hili father i had man toil a n mint i Moses prohibited by hy tho law lineal kindred of oC near i Mood anil such practices on 1111 I In the of Oo l Hv By this law a 1 Hebrew was forbidden len to I Ida his mother nr or his sister op III his hi doughier daughter or his hiM aunt women or I prohibited In blood than ClIt cousins This rule hen been general over tine sometimes ex extending tending to 10 ramifications as 88 Cor when the under III l sixth cousins In and Florida I the law IIII of Moses has been 1 In Tn several Rt ten In Kan 1111 sos ROil Maine and Montana n I man can cannot not his P anil Kentucky Include in the prohibition In respect tn to tb maniA of hos hOIl bot n n R dl of opinion mo In New York while they would be he liable to 11 ifo ln lo to Jail If the In Ail ona or A ll b n would ho he valid In New York but a que lion 1111 would n 0 If cousins residents of oC n state their marriage p were In N Nfl w 1 York ion return returned ed erl tn to The doctrine Is Hint t tn n man Inge valid where re Is IA valid but nn on th Ih other hand tho status of or of roC n a be he governed by b the stalo of or their 1 In rn Island the matrimonial pro prohibition extends e to and parents Inlaw IhlI h there thoro l n are lal pro provision vision vIlli on thai the J may mar within tho deg tH allowed by their religion Several oth r states In eluding New Jerley forbid a n man from hW fathers widow In VU 11 In West Virginia H II man cnn can not his H on states say a I man shall not marry the widow of oC u II Is n geographical g I crime In III New York HIP I for Cor whites and blocks LIncks Is denied d merely merelyn n a matter malter of taste In of or thu tho country It Imprison Imprisonment I ment In III one locality a It maa JURIl may Inny marry an octoroon hut but not n quad quadroon roon while In locality y the quadroon makes the boundary line lino In testing tile the guilt or 01 Innocence of or tho bridegroom In rn Ohio to 10 constitute a crime one nn party must b bl a R pUl e white blood Ill the other must t have n II amount of African blond to 10 ren der lieI that fact visible to t the naked eye e eIn In nome of oC th Pacific slope tho Iha legislation Is hI to 10 cover oer the Chinese hila Carolina Includes Indians I think th III it t enough hag haa been sn d to 10 show till the folly foil of the present I In which the crossing of oC an nn nary line would make n a either cither valid or Invalid and RW Involve complications sole remedy Is I to too o lain t ln laws AH All It seems Im to If rpt pet an Rm to tho States constitution giving Con s 8 the power to 10 Ip In this dl there should II somo of or action among the states nn ourel to im s The scandal hI pd A II TT Hummel In New 1011 Herald P |
