| Show i A DAMAGING DEFENCE f r A contemporary to 10 j i RZ Iz for the tilo of tho the Juvenile court and l JiN hll hI courso toUro In tn the th Knox I 1 hilt but makes milk a n ery Iry ry poor C FO on n tho of ut 1 a wry very bad cause Kir Kirit it ft declare As s e Il a we WI bellevo ht hr his bus u n i great rat deal of or got Hut i ot oC the tho th grout croat dell deal I of oC Rood gOt gOtI 10 I j tf I cited CItI In III of oC belief hoUer Th TIu L evidence Is II s to 10 tho Iho contrary H It shows hoWK ho H HA L l A of ot lorl of or of ot children to the tho reform b i chool proper CHUM and other I of at Incompetency that con coni cont t discredit the be hI belief hIlIet 1 lief lIet As Ai 11 to his hili Influence with boy oC o 0 his tn In court we wo will tf j 4 not say InY anything nt at prevent present a Il aI I Krent i at deal drill bo even ell on I that point would not be entirely ti I I favorable but It U I not riot germane to toi th i t present prent question Our contemporary fault tault with tha thu thure th f press re hero for tor giving particulars particulate of ot tho Il I luis hus cau d t io 10 o much corn com comment I j ment and then proceeds to 10 relate them themon r on Its lis lt own olm account which to say ay Urn tho I leapt In III not con l tent It ItI I i t then thEm goes goe KO s on nit to tn In favor of ot tho t l I forced physical ph examination ot of tho tire i young girl on the thu lint Hint every I In th tire tho Union follow the I I lice Ice and that there them was WIlS no way wa In Iii tin the tinI I I iWo I world to provo rov tha th of ot that w crime rime but a physical examination AVo Wo Vo deny tho the and arni III tho tiN nr or Thorn Them Is Ie S no Hiatt In III tho the Union if hem such tin on outrage an oe that i Ii l In tho Knox en enco no Would be tic tot tol tolerated i and If It tire the physical if t I tion had shown tho 10 of ot tho th thor r I It would not have lIwe laVO proved that I I the th defendant ViS guilty of ot f thu tho alleged ill r We lYe have no nr personal animosity to tor p r flint the tho iro judge Julge who wn wo be he bet t hove has lia ius no nl legal igat rl right ht to t th the ho hohol hoi holds hol Wo WI o do not Hot know him and have i h seen him bun to 10 our knowledge knowl II but I i V r wI join In III tho general Gen ral opinion that ha h hit haq q it JH iM J unlit unfit for tor or the tho petition lin hn occupies occupier 4 think that It If h ho hM any runy of ot tire tho Li ordinary of nt refined rennel hn hll r marilty anti and for tor the popular sen sentiment n he hn will quietly r retire from tim tho timI place Inc to which he ire I was wan appointed with without without 1 1 out duo consideration nod way for some porno one on legally eligible I r fry It proper training to fill lii the tho lIo f I acceptably The riFe defence put lip III for to him himI mould materially damage hla hl ca race aso o Ir If I tU It Jt ul bo hO mode any worl than It ij now no 1 1 |
