| Show HISTORY Or OF VANCE MURDER REViEWED VIE ViED Affidavit in Support of Bail Bal Re cles Story of the tho thet fj t Trial CONJECTURE E IN TIlE THE CASE a t 1 I lid lh itt Hr St roil I III 11 I ii Supreme ut Court ri Opinion t ii I lu lit tl 1 v 1 Thorn lom II th convicted of at C murder anti in III II the ihn Ihl jail jAll JAi awaiting a te of t f tho Ihu cl lied II In l f p uI by Ills hIt hl attorney John hi a 1 motion u ul h hing IHK ing IIII he lie bo ho h d t I to In ho fit or life tue motion a I l alIt ul In is I In li the tho legal of ot the tho Ihl C U Is I r Ue rd Th rh elate tat lal 8 that Ihl th t the tl elti neatly given hY of the nt tit lila thu trial of or C Vance ht hl line me Ine either or nr dl ur d dt I It t IK is a n the Ihl lie faCtOr In Ii alit aid alitt if of t the Iho and md that Ihal Ih sh Hut dilL Ill hat fliRt the Ih itt 1111 Yance lad hal hen been Further U it I Is U Said Mid she ahe h enticed canned the publication In 11 thu ho notra of tf lt which prejudiced tha thu the It 1 ItI It I I alleged 1 that Ihal I ua Vance tho the de uhe was WIH 1 under tinder Inder the con control cn trot 1101 anti and of ot Amanda Vonce WI 11 and that Ihal she che h bath hll te to Il hot hor hol fath father r hor under ln iii II from rout Mie II Ward WardIn In tho Iho motion milon tile the defendant from the opinion of lC if the 1 court reversed the Ihl court Cohn and ft It 1 IO trial In nn tin nt lo iii II that tit the he Int In t Wits Wil und that th Ih thy lint thu de do defendant c In iii II guilty guilt IIII of o the tho charged IM Is I not aiming The h motion 1101 AI finin rum Chief Justice who Hild 1 I thInk this thin IH Is I a II cat t too Iou mich und nail not hot lot enough |