Deseret Evening News | 1910-06-04 | Page 10 | Supreme Court Acts on Five Appeals

n f i SUPREME COURT t ACTS CIU CIUl j f r t t l ON fiVE FIFE APPEALS t i i ti ft In the tho IhO opinions handed down by byj byI I j r i jl I r f I 1 th the tho supreme ul n court f tr lav i P l ii 1 it a hell lo ver court JuJI 1 nl wro ero ro rol tt l i tensed two Iwo IYO tinned n Bud ami pre one if l 1 It U court decision on III a 1 WOH re reft r rc I ft c x V h l l Vl I rl J K Ii wrote nil nilI of the tho decision elt Alon and Bud nil alt were concur concurred neur red rca In by hy Justice t a rani Justice John Juhn win who rued the thi city In I tho loser court tar Cor damage on n account of u IL 41 c was nun given ghen a u sult In lu tho lower court Ivna n ordered l to be he elt nt a I new trial In the cane rou tho city In which William L J I Hili eJ Ih city for tor tu mU eus III I when wh n h hl ha run ran Into lilt n II Infective r and 1 r ere I oil n of ot nn tin of ot action u II new trial wun Ivian ordered rho The tit if t tho Iho Ih Inver court In III the case cun Cl nf ot R H t trustee run tec ap p Iel against the Ogden Oglon North Northwestern we western U rn company and the ox I of at the estate of ot A II It C Smith Hindi I wan reversed and tho the lower court ed to nd its of net fact n null conclusions of ot low law la IV to conform to j Iho expressed s by tho ho supreme r court courtIn In to the tho oa o of ot A t I 1 Know plaintiff 31 M It 11 Brothers r nn IIA assignee substitute plaintiff und and 1111 1 appellant K h At West AI tho rho judgment of lit the tho lower court Will wan The Tho h question Involved H la lathe the tho right to lu s art AH t oft two judgment ob obtained by It 1 Uri Snob Know a as 11 a II Judgment obtained bv by row rown against n We Rest IM l The rho court held that lint the tho pet It on off not lIal have been ben Allowed In thin t case CIlMO n nl na Hn Know ow had hal left loti the tand and could not claim nn In exemption Lorenzo L Montgomery sentenced to nerve leno IX months month In the tho penitentiary for a I statutory was refused u it now holy trial by hy h tho the au t court and will have hlo ha So to 10 nerve liln h 1 1 It a time