| Show OOT OT DEfENDS RAILROAD BILL Discussed Court of Commerce Almost Exclusively though It Did Not Appeal to Him film QUESTIONED BY SENATORS hI I In lu Allow 1111 r 1 w 1 I Ii K l oIl fill l Order Mi prate IMal fn fore m U ELi March Mh 10 IP H a pee J h I two 10 hour hOd sad and hud not iii t tt t upi kl b 11 l l nd when hell the MAte conate ad adIr ate w tutor Ir Root today belay came Arne to 10 toi b t i r f the rull th uI II t al bill yr Irn I fI n u of d r the Ih j h delivered red redd d I t t lined t with I t u I i i I court url of ot commerce MI to II Hoot HI defended detI I no t with I h m t r hon i old aid 01 hi II appealed lo In him himi W t I fa i Ie tr ugly than did dill mot mat of It the IheI of ot the bill billI ovi oH I I closely h 1 I uI 1 t hy by I 1 i Crawford Craw Junes June s 1 Ili II r I MI mi tle ra and und In to ton I n i ml aid 1 he h would favor an ani tho tl i i ii iii u th Ih h hill bill permitting l the I oi nI shipper In III Ceres In InIe Ie L nun inn t 1 tH II H i i 16 r the h general tr policy poky of or orI i i I i bu i buln bueI of ot the Ih guy gov govi v i r d 01 I In the department of ot otI I will continue hi hii s i h I i In speaking Ikin jut JUIll after atter g F i i K n i hi had 1 a erles i nl I to t the Ih hill bill hillI I MM c t Ii In amendment Mr KI Kl KIlo lo ri 1 v r hail had h the Ih up I of if t a an tl n mi r of lIr the Ih cont om tom ii i le 10 commerce Thle r ik r i J Mi I to hU hl hi II If ml I that Hint the committee find r i nit g mid end 1111 therefore Ih had hail I II I Tt I u II ny to lea I the Ib Ih amend amendt om 1 t t K 6 i n i many of t th Ih i t 10 i MO far rr mor mr 1 in of r commerce II H rh I 1 i I e vr ver that thet the Ih hill hili t In some p I i I i i t of or r the Ih stat mil II n of ot the III J i i I i rate air I law lav I saying ayIng the Ih M the Ib h greeted railroad or cor cori orI I i n h 1 Mate male 1 hail hAd told him he lie het lieI a t I nun If hu hi hand over r to 10 have h tt It 1 i Toiled I not e I t ran i ii i if f wax was w t Con v v hud hed rung mK Ilk like a hot bol to 10 It II Rut Hut MU In II law lew I might be a x a It am au u m i must mut urine I trillion and nd for tor their Rd ed edth d th Ii r hould huhl be lie an n expert ex perl ing j I g tin th of ot the Ih law lawm HI m the defendent i 1 il J I prom from the Ih orders order of ot the Ih Mr Ir Irr 1 r in und lid r lb Ih piment law the Ih ther r f t I Tip The Th only r i I wi S k the th in n Un Ito II hands nf ot the Ih ettor p r rl 1 I he h thought the Ih hill bill 1 m v 1 so o H sl to I permit the Ih nf r r the thi ehi r In ill all II fancH In h hi might bv tee h hD ln in led lo lh D you U belli o u k l 1 Mi Mr runs Inin In ii iam JI nut not Mi poil d by b th Ih the attorney general ih lh court could l Mill 11 upon un a of if r the th hipper r Mr r tool flan hn hll hod l nut not given thought to 10 each urh a contingent hut hul poke He lie e the th opinion It would ho he for far t r th Ih the court to 10 make mall uh sueh uhn an n order II thought however all the Ih law kw Ia bu ln M of ot the government hould h be conducted by the attorney generel lie He If It the Ih bill bl became Rm K a law Jaw lawa a Rp special deputy would l be boo by 0 the Ih attorney general ral to I deal with railroad rAI raea raper 1 Jut Junt aa xe one IK Ix now new n w p Meted to 10 conduct before br the court of f claim Im He II thought the h hn sense nene n of 0 duty dUly of ot the th could cont always ala be depended upon |
