| Show u LEGAL POINTERS FOR OWN RS OF HOUSES I Ii 5 um i J Ii Oil nL I e In II I ii ii rious nItrIc Hint 1111 Arc r of if f t Tn I Ilal I to I l I c Mon hn I Among Amon the Iho In recent real reil l It te d hd l sic in Itt tho the various course Cur throughout the different r at states state tat U Is I the Judgment frost Iro K M An Au ii tr Ier of ot property left on oil his hi the tho burnt wall vol of t a build building ing log that had d been n by h Jre and atul ald hi lI 10 t brought action against i in 1111 1 on Ii the round ground that hat the wall wail wal was wan am 11 i only unsightly but bul dangerous The Tho nit 11 ill of nf u appeals i eaU In the Iho ease case Ti Ion lur ll I 1 i I Mouth western Wn orn I i IO 1063 a th t au 11 owne nn nf f fI fit I it i u a t wall Wail wal must see that lu iti lui 11 i ined condition from tile nrc It Il ItI ii r I or ct t that It Is I mud made safe ac The Te d dI 1 I I it Jt f neIghbors neighbor In III I the hO th mutter mater I Iii ii I ii 1111 tnt tl ftc la is ur Ij I I i careful slid and an prudent man m In iii Ini iiiI II I i a 1 situation It noton In Iii II charge hare of tt such auch a ai at I t i rl r nis us agency hay hai ha done In InI ij I i crent 1111 of f the f r New Sew York Haas v us Mor Moi A 0 11 i I O N NeW e W York Hupp 1001 1004 I i 1 heli that where k e husband gava ave aveI VI I I 1 without th the signature of a his hla hi 1 the Ihl gr eisa n within a t I r elect in u reject th Ih hi purchase s In Itt to tote to toi i I 1 the his I defendant to render b I i d 4 1 pf elf II liv In 11 all l respect r peN save saus a HS Ma MaI asI I t Mi it II dower right if af hi his Wife wit where i q r in the Ihn plaintiff nitty nUt have hasa I an abate r 0 t rOt equivalent i n the gross ro value aile of ofu u dower night Ji It I has hu l tn been n held in a recent ca rl III n 1 rl h Hi S e 41 1 decided hy by h ii fc mpr in urt of ot South Mouth n I it t when hn a rc ral l 1 estate tim fr linda n a ni 1 i limer for the ii sale sal Ille of B a f certain vi pr 1 e P of f land the owner m ms may v If U he h hin 1 ii Ce e I withdraw the land from sale all 11 he lie h must pas pa the the I hI rom com 11 mission lon Just juat n op If the sale lale Ile hd had been bl made 11 1 The supreme court of nt Texas Tfx has ban hI Just hIr In the ease MI nf or nd nud 1 company It Southwestern UI that a property owner Is Ia I entitled n I t I to plant trees tre nn an the ad adJoining ut Joining sidewalk and If the Ihl wire Ire of or the Ih ln Injure tilt IJu trees Ir it I In is I tn to he be h regards regarded as an sni tn to MI I h premises I and Ino may Ia hi ha h recovered |