| Show 00 FINE IN COAL CASE Mutt Must PlY Pay 1000 And Four Fui au Other Defend Defond Defendants ants anti E oh UNDER SHERMAN ACT qi Stats In Bohall of D 0 J Sharp Char Chaj ed ed In of Trado t CHWI Allied J I 1111 Get st of I In III ThIa Ie nl City The celebrated Mil las can caine u up this before Judg tn In the United States tat dl dietric IO court and each h of r the following nt was wa fined Sned tOGA The lAlon talon Pd P Pride ride Railroad compan the Oregon Orr n Line Ute the Coal 1111 n parI ancI J M Moo Moore tel t Buck Burk who W wits shown to 10 h he all an un unWilling Willing UUna party when h the tho ac e sas II bet betty the jury JUl was a 1 TIle The bond in ID appeal n tit lit the amount or of the fin fines In to 10 1 t au question lIT by Atty C B 11 Varian tr which It III Ii to be Inferred the ta Il will cUlt b he to the rout t f appeals which sits t In Mt t 1011 Tue rhe have six Ix months th In le I Ito to ill noU notice f ot of alrea I Aset P I lit 11 DI Diet I AU Atty McI rio i c 4 mis 1 tI d sRi II h i ends nd th tb i U ii Lau 1 14 h his 0 office 11 Is uni as t to d do l dust ur of today tody III ii I b gr grof 1 of ap appeals ea which I is tet hll hl b by th district The came hn it 1 9 wit III Sm trial Immediately at t tenSion because if t tJ tI 1111 semis 11 donal charges h by 1 it J i of the h D J 1 Shar I nl 1111 Hu Hi stated that bt th lb 1111 g nal company hll had l t 1 II oal to hIm tit the 1111 InnIE r rud lime ud 1 I 1 wIe hi I hf he had chod ehas iH He alleged to tn 3 v him out of nr Tile 1 WH were lit at h trial alt 1111 t tIa II Jury Jur ill II th the nt guilty of nr In 1 rest mint of f ret traI In III violation of tl la Everett WR shown to h ha I Ia a ii iii ng pa art to 0 t h he p rid I lu I IWa Wa therefore tn nw marry h moved mod for It a new trIM hut hilt this wap d on edl J MaI U tite cU wi W taJeS n b trial triai of thi earn II lad from tM ty y the Dt t tharp harp w wt vort to sell ell reel I I ai Vi 5 at a raa ra lower than the price wanted bini to ii charge her Alt All th the nth other t coal of if t tilt h city had d upon the pre 1 to have haCo been lined d d by III the Pa Pacific Coal company pompea and the fl that Mr harl ailed to live ve ut up upI utI I I th the hut but persistently nth lul ad 1 t In the to eel 11 coal it t Ii to ht WI 61 It a 11 to twi Ie les U than dal hll harmed I n h he bad c n arnd to desist hy tit the n It t mot most to th nt It hIo hy by tb the jur jury that Mr Sharp I nell 11 within hi bl own wn rights I loving Ih the coal 1 was a In a an aI n I Ii Ion to II it II Itt I whatever price silo 11 lit fIt fItIn In n with th the d after anI fl tie or t they seemed moo to In bf be not ser 11 soil II The It fib t Ia thu li It by lh I 0 b bc excessive N and not In nith Ith Ib the feLa as they exist Th Ilso look upon the thi dI t r the h jim up WhiCh the joust tocla I bd based a and 1 the t ti trot tNt th the matte b by taking it to tn II Its nit td ed States circuit court of appeal Th o 0 I Il court how the I t lii Iu I ii keeping wit th the l mum Ih JUIVI I |
