| Show Tn tk N H A McMillin propose roo tn U deny dpn to tn fh the right In 10 petition Ih the In favor of 01 prohibition Ria HI view It if reported im that such petitions ar are for tor effect treet alone Ion and that they i be heard u no on one knows know ho how man many Democrate signed them gentleman seems m to fo be of th the opinion that the 1 Legislature h ha a i special duty to deny to 10 Democrats I Ih the right of petition 1 would recommend to that h hrad he read rad the Pint lIon of the Article 0 of the ot of Utah lie will th there H see that tbt among amone the Inalienable rights grunted to elU lel tens of th the lists le I le the tho right to at temble peaceably prot against wrongs and nd petition for red redress of grievance All Ai this right I le u In Inalienable alienable u the right to enjoy aad d defend lit and nd liberty to sequin acquire J possess and protect property we believe tho th of the thO po peo popie pie will think twice before betor th they treat any ny bod body of petitioners with ty te r on the tM golly plea piN that the there ma may be among mon them The Prohibition wave s Ia not cal al It I s both nonpartisan and nd nondenominational Men n and women ot of all 11 parties an end churches arc It In thie warfare rt against the evils of Intemperance The Th Leap Lague J Is leading Iq the movement ever everywhere and tb the church and other or that arl give their Influence lanee to 10 the furtherance or t Ih the cause ors but following that lead I It be clearly understood that this s not lIot sit n agitation that looks to th the furtherance of tM the later Interests of any an particular church hulth It la is entirely If m th the Interests ot of morality and nd there therefore fo fore hat equal claim upon the m miNn iNn bs of ill all parties and d denominations |