Show it i M P t Rr ti fM 1 i ij J JS j q S ill f U j 1 I NO 1 I i HS i I IU I I 1 1 O I I If i f SO h Reeling Jing of Resentment Among g gl r fP t i 0 J i b UI t A d t H Hj Im Imf j i l f MiNISTERIAL I RESPONSIBILITY SI I i iN t lc Defer Discussion 1 lf i Of Jt ilor Time Opinions r Of or n fV t i L i 7 it t ff I N y rl j Ys been an object of or study l n hour h 1 t to to hour in i tho members Is of oft if t lils and ti c have been carefully almost painfully pal watched wat 1 during d recent aF The of i these thc o observations with a Il l ro 10 i v rt r tho lOIs c alave alac to cr t r urt su f iii n Uc urb us to lliS 1 Ul events J beon FO fa greatly g i ng Silo T tb prevailing fooling t i the 1 I rt at ot one of ot resentment at tho popular outburst i d no n 11 0 I l The Tl C 1 de t lii In note ho i d t bl Hl h nd ch ho he hel l JI t i COil lIl t ti i iiA 11 I f tl por c r ri i n rd as rated f Ju on jOI l ts a d df c constitutional ls tI lI r l to ri I i d do f o thc e ns unchanged A committee pt ot ot the i fEl t defer d 10 i ii i In lavat of measures I il r dI l l n l d c ia c tho 1 e l Wl l tt Ih B furi t lt j I V VI I r roI Is ag 1 Ct 1 ot tho 1 enl r V 0 v 1 V 1 1 t iry n lils I address r 1 fP t c re f f t ay l JUH W mm ii ur asp r o I tev tho Iq ald tho un t r 1 tiri t ll i ul lg on l the th inal l tl 1 9 ci t r i f d h parvenu and andi 1 i th l l t l r f pl dl tic jQ lp i or Europe i cf ai tJ jJr thc t 1 Jip Jl AC me ni w Ing l n s 1 lio Tal though G not fL ni l J x tl hl t o or th Ii ci tS t tI I 11 tho t h 1 i inn nn lit BC than i i J tl C r s bt t other lI NS OF 1 i J J r tl o rel h today opinions In i li j J H Ili J i deff ij rn f 0 1 p 11 1 v Ii for fOt tho future 0 lErl est lu ller Ie dor of or Jl FJ t C I t I sJ ir ii iii lc Uie fu t t lc sn cull I a l t H t cI ot hIR f l mely chan r j thill he r r rI rIn I In y W lf c 9 i hi J Je e oP t ll tJ t demaI lh t lIt f a II law providing for iC ml r bi hr ent c h L f I ol a st H l Baron leador Icador of thol ce Con Cons s iy tUc ai d r crisis C ha d hot uld dId not iC th r Vo Ioro d ll o o i r should 1 WIt n gIlI 1 ll St thc r rt t riot nOl HO freely tre lr J tit IlO 1 j j vho i trl for Germany Jm nY really W Wg g us l l i vl ns t theIr own Yi way Herr Neumann leader rhe Imperial declarations show lilya I RPT l br f p It U 1 r chancellor felt bound uG explanation i to io Constitutional before tl Itself Apart from rom empty promises IS the do elal do not I It does es not wish l s I cb it must I neither 11 accept acc Ui Imperial criticism to x ns thi gt SZ It Il suffered i Horr B ot JC tho Na l liberals s hl Wo c Bol Uon r the crisis as ns Buelow IB Is not u t it to In n Consequence co 18 c 4 t dIe not wIsh to charge o von Due low Y th the great c L bf ott the foreign office we yo certainly dc lre that nt sh hayo l avo a i stronger n o In of government n ont Is lulon n t fa victory oVer v r e personal Ot r h h l par Iari excepting tho Socialists ido do von on to s 3 chancellor t If It he hc hud had it would have hwe been a defeat for t r us Parliament bus lut had Its way fount Kanitz leader of ot he on said We VV do nol th retirement oft von on Any An tl I Jf the crisis havo I ft to lo n Tho aho whole should be that th t Chancellor yon nn Buelow n cow j l Chancellor von V Ill i secretary of or Jhc tho Imperial t ui In t Ut hours h In tile the explained and defended tho governments tim ten financial bills tie argued that t Germany was as well able to tol l new nc revenue if Ie re rc fIn I rc l Uh The national state mu debts ot Germany ho said ag a which is not an tn burden considering cOI the tho na national wealth i Secy Sec appealed to the 1 the public to 1 pl the bills in IntI tI The Tho development of the German Gc ln n umpire and tho th German peo PM people plc he ho declared d the thc crossing of ot roads roa s The people pe plo must ither assume thoi tho burden of ot taxation If IC they thc wish to occupy the position tp t l which their theft civilization entitles s them or the tho take tako tho downward path Hath |