Deseret Evening News | 1908-11-10 | Page 4 | Law of Stolen Letters

The publication of tho letters Hearst ended has an of tho aw na to bo were taken from tho the Standard Ol Company In the current if Bar properly In a tho Writer and any either person without his is nn o wrong was io decided as early us 1741 vs Curl relating to the publication of tho letters oC Alexander The contention ot the defense was that the letters tp subjects mill contained after the pi friends and that the could not bo called a learned work there could be In But Lord n Deciding that Jotters property of tho person who wrote thein made tho following comments It If certain that no works to than havo In his i familiar arid which word never to tobo bo t Is this them HO valuable for T confess for my part that letters which Very for this arc the most dS worth any persons road Ing In I ord In Goo vs rd t at an Injunction be granted In tio case of and personal letters It therefore that of a letter has not to Its may suo t restrain tha net Hut the of loiters hris property In tho paper on written cannot enjoin i ly i Judge an lias thai right Jo Restrain PC private lot this country ns In Eng io cases Puji such when necessary for own vindication Where arc published With put tho he may action nt Kho and pu cases hus held to noah bi of writing or i p to recipient to others or i i iBy By means ot proceedings tho pt get an In against attempt to and so restrain It seema to follow that tho taking at ticklers s larceny Now Codo a mis misdemeanor demeanor to authority a letter telegram or Bother private or i copy as It does also the publication of any such r knows it to It is any proceed proceedings ings arc contemplated the casu of llio publication 6 lot tera by Mr