| Show OT 0 TilE THE i fl 1 The Jhc students tu at nt the thc University who hove have hazed a fellow student by as assaulting I him and cropping oft off his hair for obeying a IL rule of the will probably bo ho dealt with solely by that thai j jAll II honorable body All that thaI the Faculty can do in the matter lt L to 10 reprimand or gr suspend sU or 01 I u 11 student But Dut In this Ihl matter wall l does doc l that penalty fit the th Expulsion oll or hI suspension defeats tho thoI very I object that hat the State Stat has hiI In view In III maintaining tho University i Lh offense merits only that Ihal penalty it should receive none For l or n l pen penally ally nil operates only to deprive the stu student dent of o hta education and probably en entails oti tails lall additional labor on Ills hIs teachers In III instructing In him when ho he returns to hid nd h s to Lo bo 1 coached ooCh d In n to t catch up To Tel rob the thc student of ot his instruction Is simply to rob Iob the State and ami to de dc him of oC that which by hy hypothesis h he needs mo o t make of oC him a Cl good gool and useful I citizen If H for fOI ah all assault aS on a follow fellow student lurl nl a student merits punishment the law should In regular I ulal course attend o th matter If the offense does dO 1 not call for COI forthe the law HL mere men suspension only further the th offending students lack lacko of o cod Ideas and It docs to o at al tho of the tho State A reprimand or orin orIn in cases actual expulsion seem reasonable ble measures met of C correction to tobe tobe be applied by b trie t e Faculty but bul It Is Ishar hard har to understand tho philosophy ot oC suspension In case of oC hazing why not Institute an byr the proper court The policy of shielding youthful from Croll the consequences c s of of their thell criminal acts by b substituting a resolution of the Faculty Fa for COl a proceeding before beCore the magistrate does not commend Itself to thoughtful persons ns Moreover the time professors Is too precious from the standpoint of the vast ost majori majority ty I of earnest students stu to permit It to tobe tobe be wasted on a few recalcitrant reca law lawbreakers breakers I Irhe The rhe liim hand han Is best for the tho viola violators tors of law and order ol er Attempts to minimize personal assaults may be pro of o grave ravo evils Students Stu who merely disobey faculty rules may ma be dealt with by the Young men who commit an assault and especially an nn assault upon because he has respected d the rules of the school should be bl dealt with by b tribunals con constituted constituted for Cor that purpose and not nol by committees whoso only power Is to rep reprimand suspend or expel A breach of the peace may be he a 11 seri flerl serious ous thing and an un assault U saull of or the nature reported from froll the tho University campus isa criminal act that may mn also give to 10 the person assaulted an all action In dam damages ages Iges Is it not time that faculties were ere candid arid uri reasonable In dealing with students who engage in the despicable and brutal practice of oC hazing I |
