| Show BRYAN EXPLAINS THE Between Labor Organizations And Combinations In Re Restraint I I of Trade AND JURY TRIALS III I ii Nm nil 1111 ull nil on of nf 1111 II me rt m 10 II 1 lur tilts LIncoln Aug u G J Bryan to clu ilay n mm to 10 it a circular ionic Omo weoka ago hY by the National A of era and h I Y V Van Mm declares that the or Of Mr 1 Van rallies two to liNt Is there anything In thu lite in III lip hOI Of oC the tho to which business COIl take Is Iii IsOw the Ow labor SO Important to 10 mon n to 10 justify timena In Ig nil other hiMe tl Ir r declares that the Ion In ha tho th DemocratIc platform for forthe the creation or a with a I lit at it head call not IIO hu ell lIe He lIethen then I n s rho fhe distinctIon a associations or of auge organized for the thc of oC a anti the or of labor abor corporations which act in III restraint of oC trude Thu Tho between a labor lion 1101 onti II a troit I Is so that no ItIl disinterested person II deny n that the they should be treated To 0 two of to I multi deal them ono One law laia Is Ii tb III do injustice to 10 one Or time tho other the hu mon mOIL cnn can hn no nl vInI I nl concern In iii Including time Iho organizations In the anti antItrust trust III theil takes up time the Plank I providing fOr Iw h jury jur Ira In cities eS or of I lie that thu cannot rOute U a question of vital tim 10 men mon bob hua II a right to mm II JUT jury trial JIo then says An attempt will ivill ho be made to 10 raise 1 a false falI Issue In iii regard to the courts tImId to make it II that the Iho de cle fur or by jury Is Iii an upon the IntegrIty of tile tho Those who make tills argument might as aR well InsIst au the Ihl abolition of oC the tho jury jur In all 1111 cases for tor the jur jury s system Is IA Just liS much II reflection tuba ullon the OH Is the demand Cor trial h by Jury is III these particular en e eHul Hul there III ii another plunk that Mr Van Cleave probably In mind ThIs is 19 the tho declares that parties to nil all judIcial proceedings ho bo treated with rIgid amid that an Injunction would not lie If nl imo industrial dispute wore were Involved Do 10 the business men tn insist tipotI partIality In judIcial logs Do tile the Insist the Iho more mere fact that thorn Is on nn should justify nn aim Injunction That plank does doea not attempt to Inter fern with tIme Iho 1 hum lIuo of at an Injunction whore other condItions justify It but bul it II oppose the tho issue ot of nn an merely for tor the tho purpose of bring bog court into the of nn an anI I limit I it Input 0 Mr Van Cleave asserts that tills thu plank arouses n a spirit and do mands for Cor class favors this Is if not true title It is IH a mice that Ihal the wrIt injunction ot nol ilot he 10 us used cd for the purpose of oC creating n or r favoring It a class clas The laboring men resent nn ama to discriminate agaInst them In CI a rot or ot I an any other othor class Mi III Bryan In conclusion declares that Mr fr Van Cleave Cleao does the Iho business tIn nn injustice In a assuming that hIs ilia waking hours are tilled Oiled wIth reams fells of oC tIle the wn wage all that hIs rc rest i Is III by imaginary dIsputes with those who ho toil loll |
