| Show o on tho 1110 wisdom and an 1 lon of nr thom who guIde our aliI cOlin 01 1 ye only judo lit or what o is III to 10 he i their In tho hiat what tile tho J nm III flint lii hi th which urn lire to Wo ft n ii t ii i t ot of policy nolle to thol tho hll that tho tha Oust must 11 lit at tha 10 1 of th tb ell ad t It haN hall halli 1 i nl tilt othel 1111 now i more I is huit th one cue shall hr II the city Improve It ft r further Who shall his 11 with ot of the Iho money and for Pant n cuI r I ni PI u hall hia I I Wi WA hun ES I H 1 has tItle 1 I It on the th iut t 1 u f an 1111 opinion s to tho thu future t WI i j ri I I tho mOnO iii al already I II I 11 t ready WI si e an Veto C to II I 11 tn t 1110 Into J I I l th t I city cily iu nui so 10 lI lately J ph ii IJ I i tit the ti a n lit of litI I same 1 St oC Its II V Thin Tho for Utti u of r moo fur for 1 I U It wo Ic nut hut vote 1 r 1 for bOnds rID halt 1 WO Ii h hI e t L I another of oC into i ii ht to tl t Ii C ii I tN Ii lit liv Iv this I cull hut I a H Call c U iid u 11 l i Mt I any ho 1111 ti such j t I uh I tot Int debt delli rl I I ii ulu 1111 of I hi Q Ih I V lute Inlo h I I I it au i t n of l on k kI 1 t I I ch till i I th I T tahi 1 Il In i r h Li rt tor i the tho I Qt Ind bU bUI but I no not II II 4 thu h city ty 1 thon To lo carr oUt the 1 ether bond hond will ho be In n short Ahart argument Is t that tho they have hlo bankrupted the tho ell city and that the pru owners owner have nu no but to furnish the Ihn lid ad nul money monc tho they lire are thu c lon 1008 nut tollow Granted that the IJ t empty that ln would bo b benefIcIal that thai additional firs desirable te Ie yet all duos does not provO prove hat the tire bound to 10 put hut other Into the hl of at those tholo ho may their moI Our contemporary the Is 0 one ot of those thoM misled by this kind of oC argument It shows how the from trum the former bond bondI I SHI hll hus been In unwIsely hut but It says oY there thero la Is now no help belt for tor that It ol argues ues thAt the CIty must flutist either vote ot tho bonds or sub lub submit mit to 10 us It conn levy lovy by the ll It as asIn In truth It almost to dl um un any phae ot of the linn except the tha two alternatives of offered offered To who Sho prefer a high tax levy lev 1 e 0 thos tho who prefer preter a high tax taz rate thin the problem Is le und they thoy should l vote the bonds bond Tho Those e who ho bellove It the part of at wis wisdom dom to over a Period of oC oCt I t years the coat ot of public hurt will vote Cot fOI the tho bondA that Is about all there Is to the bond Xo No that Is nut not all there Is to the bond them ls Is else olse that Is whether Se 0 con can entrust another vast sum ot of our mune money to thu lender care of those par particular For tho th It ls b the tho dut duty of civic common prudence and good to vote Ioto against the I Ls of bonds Jonel |
