Show BRYAN RECEIVES LABOR DELEGATES Chairman Presents Resolutions Expressing ConfidenCe in Him And Pledging Support CANDIDATE VERY GRATEFUL ook II tO 11 rit I I iii I I iu 1 I Nih b Tonight Mr Dryal Bryan reCeived at hil hut home n a large laro delegation fron thI local Ceo Cen Tue he If of pro tl Ii Mr MI Bryan IX cx I he co co In him and their or of his cant dl for lor While this wits purely time tho afforded Mr OIl Bryan 11 nit opportunity to make hut first real political cal speech sinco his itis 11 lie hIs thaI tile 1 leaders have hac H itO lell itch wIth tIle thu work of the re res or of tho Don Domi Donvel Domier vel er convention Alt 1 1 said ld of thin the Ia Labor bor un no unon ion on 1 I mimmi vely to yon for fOl thIs or of Ill maid pledge IC t your our support rite fhe reM iCO hutton II Is the tho more to mo mae be becaUse caUse it conies frol from YOI YOU whom I 1 I lived lieu for tor a little Ul over 20 O clr time the that that n b by neighbors and ther arc 1010 that I prize moro more highly OIn that thIs voluntary proffer or of your this or of your OUI uld amid of at your OUI good wi I It II is true that our on en mm IL er of t remedial an and I fl ant II in hearty heart wIth tl tIme lit Is not nott t It lne lit In that II ta favor of 1 doca not have 1 amy Tills This Is tIle the or the piece to elaborate upon ullon tholo those an k Is 1 plank there that I las watt Vcr very bus lous to II time tho It WIS II iii tile tho platform of years the plank dank that proposes 1 a 1111 cabInet post pol tit ii ml II ot of labor wih with II a secretary lt at Its head I 1 have hae reI for pars ars belIeved that time tho great groat bod body ot of OUT our population us its ought to bo be represented In the tho councils ot of the chief executive I 1 have long b be It o ought to hlo have a or of in time tho shops ull lac fac factories tories tu a representative nt at the presidents delts dents table In hIs UnIt and forth there thoro on those ques questions in which labor lieu hes I a special In And I 1 ant am very ely much gratified that that Is there thoN Ind and that the PartY lies hus mado this promise I tt entrust entrusted ed 1 siti power to give to labor that high to which It Is Imi entitled I 1 thInk too that It is IH very vary Import runt that wo 0 should have ni an meat ment to the tho antitrust law that wi wIlt draw 1 a dIstinction between tho those e who l associate together for mutual Ino hue bet between those and those who UHs associate lao together In industrial corporations for tor the that o of artcle article of at corn mere Th There re Is I a so HO brad broad between the these e two classes of oC lions that It seems to le me ovely evemy one alto ought to be e able to see It and amid that dis ought to be drawn b by Iw law I glad that Is In the platform I In ama glad that thero Is n a provision In ther there lit In to I a trial b by jury jur In or of Indirect contempt It Is no Ile like 13 years ears ago I believe I flit had bad occasion to discuss that subject I it WIS was after I 1 went out ot of Congress mund before I WIS was nominated for th the presidencY presIdency the tho A Ahi AbIll hi bIll was the senate tutu os as I recollect time tho history of 01 I it It was about like this I It 11 was reported back Iron the Ice of et the senate senale and In thu tho form In which It was reported the Judo judge coull could permit I It jury When I that report I 1 nt at once It and amid sold that th the bi bill should not provIde merely tImeX the tho judge might permit 0 a jury but butI butEL I EL jury jur should bo be d 11 aim I a muter mutter or of right by the tho t und amid my recollection reco lection II that Alien of thIs state an amendment to that effect and It was nn and l I it wont through by so unanimous n a vote that no Olo omme for th roll I It II i tha than 13 12 years eurs since Inc that Ind yet et the tho whIch bare been buemi opposed to this have s so that up to tItle this that nr ml justice has beel bloated 1 nm mm very glad Iad that In Our OUI platform there Is a provision tiO le n a trial by jury In cles cases of oC In imi direct I UI an glad too that we are able to agree upon UI that Ih or of wits was satisfactory to leaders the tho uteri mon ald amid the tho lemr ot of thin Iho resolutions I also ate lun Gmt ld fled ald I think the tho that ough ought to bu be satIsfactory to al all YOI 1 thai this 1 is no mio II itt to wIth time tho I ot thin writ of 01 injunction whore whore there II is for tor it H hut but that this wrIt shall not bo be Issued In disputes that miot justify Is ware thero nO labor ought to bl be satIsfactory to ni In Imi other that It shall not ll bm for that tho purpose Itt to one purt ur Of II labor dl pilo 11 advantage IVr time tho other hut but there IU must t be that would justify 11 Its 1 Ir if worn no mm lu In hOr I III t t thum tho labor In Im I It Il tn iii that wiy IL ho for they lucy hao not asked for tor special tm time nato men menI I referred to those IU its KIO o of time In Iii limo Iho lit fOrum I believe bce It run ho be that tO imo great party his eter IL a putt form that so SD IH its does that Is IN of nt vital to t great toiling In of try Ind multi I 1 am un Wil wits enouGh to 10 1010 limmi IKI b by 11 all ut OUI on m t Ion I I lie u Id ty wih Ii fl h so for who mIre are knowlI 18 el ems those who trIm belong to 10 the labor or gO ol t his II nan I iii I tIP YOI you ought t to 1 by Iho who lol toil In other othur l of industry lor or I Is just jUL 11 lit 1111 to those who SCud tol toll ii mm tho I he ii nH a to t who till I ii 11 t lie 1101 1 it II Is Il 11 trul t ru e to hose 1 who loll III him time the ot of II Its to 10 thosa who tol toil In imi time Iho Ir tro JI Jim I it worl wont It Il H I to 10 mite forth Corth II tue Inlet tat st of tho IVelle average th I People AlI AmId It Is h cUM I believe t its In time tho Ihl the preg or of OUr came must mut ho e IMo by time the or Of thin maim that I Ih time you ou In hove 1 amid th the of support 3 01 that Ine given I nn |