| Show A LAW NOT A L Defect in statute P F Geiger Escapes Prosecution For NonSupport of Family BANNER YEAR FOR FRUIT Will III j UL 11 tu to Oll OItI II By r ug NoIe E en Jul Is I n II law not 1 a saw J Is n II question that Is h being by n a nUmber of oC 1011 II ers who liearI or of tile the case CUSO of the State ot o against Philip F Gle Gieger el which ha 1111 bt non Oil tho criminal docket ot of the tho court for a number of o weeks which iv yesterday nt at I upon the motion of At I and In which County Attorney Bards The Geiger COIO Is h one that t ba occupied pied considerable attention in the court circles since lie he back train from California In III the tho part of at May Mayto to fu a charge of at to tood and clothing for tor hI children The charge against Gel kiger er grew out or at a alIel not lIel ilL Ian passed by tho h t l and cI whIch has hos been found to be as por Ilor aS a sieve The that the law lawwill lawwill will nut hold Is that II a wife cannot los ts against hor husband and Uld a the wIfe vite Is the prIncipal witness In most of the cases whore failure to provIde h 11 the mojor charge It Ie Ia very probable that there will ho few tew prosecutions The Tho following Is the tho court Proceed ln In the tho case Geiger which was before Judge howell at The eo court State of Utah against GeIger Is the defendant in III Are you ready gentlemen Mr lr your honor please titter consulting the county attorney anti the complaining In this case especially Inasmuch as ae there thore Is III pending before your OUI hanor another ca cac Involving more 0 ol less the tho same sarno facts is IS In this case cne and probably the whole matter can be adjusted and probably will bo be adjusted by your honor hanoI In that case I think that the of ins lice would be best by the tho of this action at this time for Cor that reason I will I 1 understand the count county attorney concurs with ma In the tho the dismissal of the action at this time The Tho Courtn may bo be so 50 ordered Js is discharged COURT SCORES BUSINESS SYSTEM I IIII In III the case caIO or of II H J J Teller Toller agaInst the Edmundo Tailoring company which ivas tried foro Judge Howell luring the tho term tenn of oC court and token under advisement II a decisIon WItS was handed d yesterday In which the 1110 in awarded dan s In the nin of far tor back wa wages eB eBIn In the handed down b by the tho thoI I ourt the tho manner In which the tho if f the tho company wore conducted were oro criticised b by theco the court rt The Tho ourt also pointed tod out that there was failure on the part 0 defendant company of oC which the tho plaIntiff was wal manager to comply wIth the laws of the State Slate ot of Utah which bleh It was WIlS incorporated In closing the tho court It is III regrettable for the plaintiff that tha hie formation of this corporation was s so slovenly and that Its business ivas 1113 thereafter conducted In such n a slipshod manner but nevertheless the creditors should not ho bo compelled to stiffer for tor such dereliction l Perhaps the tho court history of at this corporation will afford n a wh wholesome lesson to other car cor of th community If there thero therel hp l any such nail and to those who nie 1110 In interested In thorn whIch verc formed Oil HR thIs one was and whoso whose bu s is 11 d In the tho same samo AW In the tho district cou court JI in the case ot of 1111 C against the tho J P o 0 Nelli eIll Construction company compan the tho jury brought In J a verdict last In fa faor a or of the in III the Iho sum of lh his original amount asked for fOI was Willi was for tor gravel and rock hauled away tram froni tim ph prop property erty by the tho defendant It WitS was shown ot at the tho trial that the tho amount of dom dam damage age dunn dono to 10 the tho property Wits us the JUI jury returned a verdict for |
