| Show WATER ATER DECISION ti IS ELUCIDATED TED H Judges Richards and Hues Hiles Ex Explain Explain plain Rights of City In Big Cottonwood Creek AT REQUEST OF THE COUNCIL lt t I l It 2 U 0 h or t 1 I tel u I CAnal lit III Th purport inc or o thO Iho 10 cI lon In the cn e h b Judge MorRe 1111 I Car nH Lake al o Is I hus boti dated In Il i ot of the Iho ease It by byr r Judge s and Atty 10 1 S saIl City In Inthe the tho great CM Just Th Tile report w with tt 0 1 at hl l ce o lllA wI ask hilt big I to th sub submit mit ti n of ir tho jho HD of nt tooting the rIghts or of Bull City fly I to the tito waters ot of HIS creel after aCter 1171 of tho o of Moro In the ell c tho rights of Cit City are aro t as I To the tho nien tho ihn court la i aake aka CIty 18 to divert through i ithe the tho Dig Cottonwood during low loll lIn on under FakE con contracts tracts of at with the mg Hg Ditch 1111 1 Canal companIes 9 or of the 09 I IM 2 tho o of the Ir 11 tig tinK when the wlter ater o of the an does noL exceed cubic feet per iel the Ihl city cIt the other par partI tic tI lire nrc entitled to lo take froth the thi lii proportion to ih the o f their thIr which for tOI the Big lJ Ditch lt anti Lower canal Is I found to he bi 6 30 cubic feet per second respect respectIvely Ively |