| Show RE EASED RATES I ii t dIll I I is I tu to t lii Lu lot I forum J Pru ci let JUliO is IH expected timid h a today loday h by the I I n tend a to con I ii the matter lit cit rates will Im 11 little out elSY make tar III Uniformity III rail romul rhe opinion by y 1 U It u a ride mIL imi II a 1 PP m flU t I iii iI dc of duo ci to 10 causee time tilt Ihu III 15 If It a title Is con Upon ulon tIle shipper the Iho entIre risk of lots time Iho conditIon Is void 01 1 Ills 1111 title dUe tu Iti Iho carriers I I te O or III o I in J I II m attu la Is them timI that tile tue shall not lIot II Iud fled a I tic I he et I I Is III i iii loss O I till tb Ll VIII lose ION ii Id title Ihlo tu 1 tle l carriers It if lh time lil impel I Itt It iii mud r tiecia iou tilt Iho va lime 01 0 Jr bY hit it II In III god faith 11 as the Iho timid ihme Ihl mu II iii lix fIt cit III tt JI it o tIL r 1 is III void Il as against loss due to tho carriers negligence or 01 other mis misconduct misconduct conduct It if the I amount does docs not to he an agreed valuation but ht huts been arbItrarily b by the tho ecu 9 riel reference to 10 the Iho zeal real rich Un or r If the purported agreed is In hi fact purely purel nod rep represents resents an attempt to II limit It the carriers lIr liability to 10 an arbitrary amount A E sl scab lo ot of charges applicable to 10 a specific commodity and graduated rca rel according to value alue ho b iii good faith fulth I regard being had to Ito Iho actual value of tIme property offered fot A must not use or of its rel released l mis IIIi a 1 oC it liability for the remise or of Its HR negligence It Is II a ml practise Cut car to pUblish In iii their tariffs anti on their of lading rules and art are unreason unreasonable able or 01 incapable of Igal Iun In it eurt or of law amid Il a that thal nil 1111 charge of 21 20 pr per cent shall be collected ott property thAt Is shIpped I not to limited lIability Is III unreasonable |